From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59833F7AB7; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790244551; cv=none; b=pGm4kZCtbFOasigHaAredNYOZgH8JBaFxOzSuS8YgvuTr7/yDLp1mOCzW7CEakSjNMyQB/X5rD5mkC+/eU+XBjmquXnk/YTEhlgnglmLAzSoQTxWaNiDTDUVHT/0WHEGyErWDfF0febtkAaQxoCJ/BJ9uTBHpFeV3RQUBg6LNrU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790244551; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mKA7Qztj2NKdw/qGpGeNKMOTd17HuJjc6ryW1Dgj7eE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Y1L8LRyBPg1HFina8QPAcUkOxY/kJdeXSOgkeqMAfXNJbh3a7Kswbm6927EgNQmYJJ+snhxotvZGRR387U1EaGDgGGhX2QW46usxT0XyBQwQSxwxdNuBg79pXIZYXpD/lFpfgm7Jf9L8/5x8ZSBIrz3FzkVDE0GqktUq9LZG8os= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=i/1xxhPs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="i/1xxhPs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=X9FI8dEsjjF0aFs5SF8Kf+k9ccTADTmP7ntJMxcCLNo=; b=i/1xxhPs+ablmrHTkG58KcnaGK f2oDjNJ00iWHaWUG3jCTJOaumNl/pNzjbJZrKSAdtgzqzOj075PsL3xJnPkopGxBE2ToBqspbD6sa 9qrI7tRHCVGbntmQE7BdlPASEhjN6xfufVjyYC6DVB6Llj7BaI00LVF9tWKm+uwj80SWoQEqQecfL 5ux462sKgxi0ay5FQv+NDZhPwH9z+K80+jCouQhSnu3P8qJzqkkzUrH+O8qhu28SZ+RyoVbxSO3Hj gb33vNlorXs+Es/jhOaZAl4K4uanimZMRtJN4n9Q7pn8UlvGuJiq7oJAErwVOSliu7cP1ettcdu23 QzkM1UsA==; Received: from 85-127-111-79.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at ([85.127.111.79] helo=localhost) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x9gNz-0000000Afld-0C8y; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 10:09:03 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Zorro Lang Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: xfstests support for RT data checksums Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:07:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20260924100855.2734089-1-hch@lst.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Hi all, this series adds support for testing the new XFS RT data checksum feature. Most of it should be fairly straight forward, but I'd like to hear about the new xfs/2304 and xfs/2305 tests. These are basically copy and pasted from existing very long running tests, but add calls to xfs_scrub -x. It might make sense to just add this to the existing tests conditionally on the new XFS_VERIFY_FILE_DATA flag, but I'd like to hear various opinions on that.