From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] f2fs/008: test snapshot creation/deletion on lvm device
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 21:18:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38a448c9-5cd4-482e-8411-a801995199c3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241224095821.ylfv622fifsk3tsv@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>
On 2024/12/24 17:58, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 04:23:45PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> This patch introduce a regression testcase to check whether
>> f2fs can handle discard correctly once underlying lvm device
>> changes to not support discard after user creates snapshot
>> on it.
>>
>> Related bug was fixed by commit bc8aeb04fd80 ("f2fs: fix to
>> drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm device")
>>
>> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> - rebase to last for-next branch
>> - update according to Zorro's comments.
>> tests/f2fs/008 | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/f2fs/008.out | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 tests/f2fs/008
>> create mode 100644 tests/f2fs/008.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/008 b/tests/f2fs/008
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 00000000..b85e321c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/008
>> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2024 Oppo. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test No. f2fs/008
>> +#
>> +# This is a regression test to check whether f2fs can handle
>> +# discard correctly once underlying lvm device changes to not
>> +# support discard after user creates snapshot on it.
>> +#
>> +
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +_begin_fstest auto quick rw
>> +
>> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit bc8aeb04fd80 \
>> + "f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm device"
>> +
>> +_require_scratch_nolvm
>> +_require_block_device $SCRATCH_DEV
>> +_require_command "$LVM_PROG" lvm
>> +
>> +lvname=lv_$seq
>> +vgname=vg_$seq
>> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> + _unmount $SCRATCH_MNT >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> + $LVM_PROG lvremove -ff /dev/mapper/$lvname-snapshot $vgname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> + $LVM_PROG lvremove -ff /dev/mapper/$vgname-$lvname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> + $LVM_PROG vgremove -ff $vgname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> + $LVM_PROG pvremove -ff $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> + _udev_wait --removed /dev/mapper/$vgname-$lvname
>> + cd /
>> + rm -f $tmp.*
>> +}
>> +
>> +$LVM_PROG pvcreate -f $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> +$LVM_PROG vgcreate -f $vgname $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> +$LVM_PROG lvcreate -L 1024m -n $lvname $vgname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>
> The lvcreate might be blocked by:
> "WARNING: f2fs signature detected on /dev/vg_008/lv_008 at offset 1024. Wipe it? [y/n]:"
Oh, I didn't encounter this... is it due to I use low version lvm tool?
lvm version
LVM version: 2.03.11(2) (2021-01-08)
Library version: 1.02.175 (2021-01-08)
Driver version: 4.48.0
>
> So better to use "lvcreate -y" or "yes | ...".
Sure.
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
>> +_udev_wait /dev/mapper/$vgname-$lvname
>> +
>> +_mkfs_dev /dev/mapper/$vgname-$lvname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> +_mount -o discard /dev/mapper/$vgname-$lvname $SCRATCH_MNT >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> +
>> +dd if=/dev/zero of=$testfile bs=1M count=20 >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> +sync
>> +rm -f $testfile
>> +sync
>> +
>> +# create a snapshot on lvm device
>> +$LVM_PROG lvcreate -L 1024m -s -n $lvname-snapshot /dev/mapper/$vgname-$lvname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>> +
>> +echo "Silence is golden"
>> +
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/008.out b/tests/f2fs/008.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..dd68d5a4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/008.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +QA output created by 008
>> +Silence is golden
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-26 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-21 8:23 [PATCH v3 1/2] common/rc: support f2fs in _mkfs_dev() Chao Yu
2024-12-21 8:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] f2fs/008: test snapshot creation/deletion on lvm device Chao Yu
2024-12-24 9:58 ` Zorro Lang
2024-12-26 13:18 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2024-12-27 7:21 ` Zorro Lang
2024-12-28 0:59 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38a448c9-5cd4-482e-8411-a801995199c3@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox