From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, chandan@mykolab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/224: Increase filesystem instance size to 1.5 GiB
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:38:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F230A3.2070300@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2500094.kBUgEuDpMB@localhost.localdomain>
Chandan Rajendra wrote on 2015/09/01 08:03 +0530:
> On Monday 31 Aug 2015 22:15:10 Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:49:14AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
>>> mkfs.btrfs when invoked on small filesystems by "not" specifying any block
>>> sizes (i.e. mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda1) will automatically create filesystem
>>> instance with "data block size" == "metadata block size". However in the
>>> subpagesize-blocksize scenario, we need to specify both data and metadata
>>> block size on the command line (For e.g. mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4096 -n 16384
>>> /dev/sda1). In this case, Since the user is forcing the block sizes and it
>>> is impossible to have mixed block groups with differing data and metadata
>>> block sizes, mkfs.btrfs will fail.
>>
>> Ok, so the issue is that for this particular test configuration, btrfs
>> has a minimum file system size. What about changing
>> _scratch_mkfs_sized so that if MIN_FS_SIZE is set, the file system
>> created will be at least MIN_FS_SIZE in size.
>>
>> This way it sets the minimum file system size for all tests, not just
>> generic/224, and any test configuration, whether it be ext4, xfs, or
>> btrfs where the data and metadata block size are the same, don't have
>> to take extra time -- only the test configuration of btrfs with
>> data_block_size != metadata_block_size.
>>
> I agree with the approach you have suggested. I will write up a patch and send
> it across the mailing list. Thanks Ted.
>
Hi Chandan,
Although the reply may be a little late, but I think it's still better
to fix the bug in mkfs.btrfs.
The core problem is, why mkfs.btrfs is insisting on make the fs into
mixed-bg.
Auto detection for small device and make it into mixed-bg should be a
"OPTIONAL" feature, not a "mandatory" one.
So IMHO, the best method is to disable mixed-bg when nodesize/sectorsize
is given and differs and user doesn't force mkfs to create mixed-bg.
Thanks,
Qu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-30 14:46 [PATCH] generic/224: Increase filesystem instance size to 1.5 GiB Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-31 18:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-08-31 19:19 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-08-31 21:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-09-01 0:19 ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-01 0:38 ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-01 2:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-09-01 2:33 ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-11 1:38 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-09-22 5:18 ` Chandan Rajendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F230A3.2070300@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chandan@mykolab.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox