From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tbjjbihbhebab.turbo-smtp.net ([199.187.174.101]:57260 "HELO tbjjbihbhebab.turbo-smtp.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751713AbbJERPN (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:15:13 -0400 Message-ID: <5612B01C.50600@sysam.it> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:15:08 +0200 From: Angelo Dureghello MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: help on xfs test results References: <560C69D9.6020807@sysam.it> <560CF355.7050200@sysam.it> <20151001235653.GH3902@dastard> <560DD051.4080407@sandeen.net> <20151002003834.GI3902@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20151002003834.GI3902@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner , Eric Sandeen Cc: fstests List-ID: Hi Dave, Eric and all, still thanks. About generic/256 failing in my system, in the xfstests README there is: - create fsgqa test user ("sudo useradd fsgqa") this creates the user, but in /etc/passwd comes "/bin/sh" as shell, and in this system is it "dash". Redirection to /dev/null as required from this test then fails. Setting to "/bin/bash" test passes. About xfs/136, ack, thanks. On 02/10/2015 02:38, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:31:13PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >> >> On 10/1/15 6:56 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: >>> Are you testing with something like selinux or some other security >>> subsystem enabled that creates attributes at inode creation time? >> >> In theory, xfstests detects this and mounts with an fs-wide context >> to avoid that... > > For selinux, yes. i don't think it's aware of anything else, > though... > > Cheers, > > Dave. > Best regards Angelo