From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] check: Make the test harness unmount fs when finishing a test
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 17:57:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B03E985.2070501@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526969013-16134-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 2018/05/22 14:03, Xiao Yang wrote:
> Finishing xfs/132 left a shutdown scratch fs and the test harness didn't
> unmount the fs(because we told it not to check the fs) so the test harness
> called by subsequent xfs/133 tried to "test -d $SCRATCH_MNT" and received
> the IO error from the dead fs.
>
> i.e. Running xfs/132 and xfs/133 together got the following error:
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> xfs/132 1s ... 1s
> xfs/133 1s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /var/lib/xfstests/results//xfs/133.out.bad)
> ...
> QA output created by 133
> -Format and mount
> -Corrupt filesystem
> -Remount, try to append
> -Write did not succeed (ok).
> +SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda11 is mounted but not on SCRATCH_MNT=common/config: - aborting
> +Already mounted result:
> +/dev/sda11 /mnt/xfstests/scratch
> ...
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Even if we don't check fs, the test harness is supposed to unmount fs and
> return an initial state before running the next test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> check | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/check b/check
> index 96198ac..a0d5364 100755
> --- a/check
> +++ b/check
> @@ -489,10 +489,14 @@ _check_filesystems()
> if [ -f ${RESULT_DIR}/require_test ]; then
> _check_test_fs || err=true
> rm -f ${RESULT_DIR}/require_test*
> + else
> + _test_unmount
> fi
> if [ -f ${RESULT_DIR}/require_scratch ]; then
> _check_scratch_fs || err=true
> rm -f ${RESULT_DIR}/require_scratch*
> + else
> + _scratch_unmount
Hi,
Sorry, some tests have unmounted them inside, so drop the stderr from
umount.
The v3 patch is coming. :-(
Thanks,
Xiao Yang
> fi
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-19 4:32 [PATCH] xfs/132: umount scratch device after finishing test Xiao Yang
2018-05-21 2:36 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-21 7:45 ` Xiao Yang
2018-05-21 22:46 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-22 4:06 ` Xiao Yang
2018-05-22 5:19 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-22 6:03 ` [PATCH v2] check: Make the test harness unmount fs when finishing a test Xiao Yang
2018-05-22 9:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Xiao Yang
2018-05-22 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2018-05-22 9:57 ` Xiao Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B03E985.2070501@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox