fstests.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/220: fix quotarm syscall test
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:34:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61D64732.3030505@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220105195352.GM656707@magnolia>

on 2022/1/6 3:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong<djwong@kernel.org>
>
> In commit 6ba125c9, we tried to adjust this fstest to deal with the
> removal of the ability to turn off quota accounting via the Q_XQUOTAOFF
> system call.
>
> Unfortunately, the changes made to this test make it nonfunctional on
> those newer kernels, since the Q_XQUOTARM command returns EINVAL if
> quota accounting is turned on, and the changes filter out the EINVAL
> error string.
>
> Doing this wasn't /incorrect/, because, very narrowly speaking, the
> intent of this test is to guard against Q_XQUOTARM returning ENOSYS when
> quota has been enabled.  However, this also means that we no longer test
> Q_XQUOTARM's ability to truncate the quota files at all.
>
> So, fix this test to deal with the loss of quotaoff in the same way that
> the others do -- if accounting is still enabled after the 'off' command,
> cycle the mount so that Q_XQUOTARM actually truncates the files.
>
> While we're at it, enhance the test to check that XQUOTARM actually
> truncated the quota files.
>
> Fixes: 6ba125c9 ("xfs/220: avoid failure when disabling quota accounting is not supported")
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong<djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>   tests/xfs/220 |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/220 b/tests/xfs/220
> index 241a7abd..cfa90d3a 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/220
> +++ b/tests/xfs/220
> @@ -52,14 +52,28 @@ _scratch_mkfs_xfs>/dev/null 2>&1
>   # mount  with quotas enabled
>   _scratch_mount -o uquota
>
> -# turn off quota and remove space allocated to the quota files
> +# turn off quota accounting...
> +$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c off $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +# ...but if the kernel doesn't support turning off accounting, remount with
> +# noquota option to turn it off...
> +if $XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'state -u' $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q 'Accounting: ON'; then
> +	_scratch_unmount
> +	_scratch_mount -o noquota
> +fi
> +
> +before_freesp=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
> +
> +# ...and remove space allocated to the quota files
>   # (this used to give wrong ENOSYS returns in 2.6.31)
> -#
> -# The sed expression below replaces a notrun to cater for kernels that have
> -# removed the ability to disable quota accounting at runtime.  On those
> -# kernel this test is rather useless, and in a few years we can drop it.
> -$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c off -c remove $SCRATCH_DEV 2>&1 | \
> -	sed -e '/XFS_QUOTARM: Invalid argument/d'
> +$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c remove $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +# Make sure we actually freed the space used by dquot 0
> +after_freesp=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
> +if [ $before_freesp -ge $after_freesp ]; then
> +	echo "before: $before_freesp; after: $after_freesp">>  $seqres.full
I prefer to move this info outside the if. So even case pass, I still 
can see the difference in seqres.full.
> +	echo "expected more free space after Q_XQUOTARM"
Do you forget to add this into 220.out?


Also, I try this patch and add some output about delta.
It seems before_value greater than after value.

  #Make sure we actually freed the space used by dquot 0
after_freesp=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
delta=$(($before_freesp - $after_freesp))
echo "before: $before_freesp; after: $after_freesp, delta: $delta" >> 
$seqres.full
if [ $delta -ge 0 ]; then
         echo "expected more free space after Q_XQUOTARM"
fi

MOUNT_OPTIONS =  -o defaults
before: 21280804864; after: 21280808960, delta: -4096


Best Regards
Yang Xu
> +fi
>
>   # and unmount again
>   _scratch_unmount

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-06  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-05 19:53 [PATCH] xfs/220: fix quotarm syscall test Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-06  1:34 ` xuyang2018.jy [this message]
2022-01-06  1:55   ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-01-06 17:03     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61D64732.3030505@fujitsu.com \
    --to=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).