From: "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: "fstests@vger.kernel.org" <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs/126: Add a getxattr opeartion after corrupted xattr
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:41:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61D648E5.3010209@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211126232817.GA266000@magnolia>
on 2021/11/27 7:28, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 01:13:27PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
>> It is design to reproduce a deadlock on upstream kernel. It is introduced by kernel
>> commit 07120f1abdff ("xfs: Add xfs_has_attr and subroutines") and fixed by kernel
>> commit a1de97fe296c ("xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname")[1].
>>
>> [1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=a1de97fe296c
>
> NAK, this is a general fuzz test. Please create a separate targeted
> regression test for the kernel bugfix so that you can control exactly
> which part of the attr leaf block gets corrupted so that the verifier
> will signal error.
Sorry for the late reply.
IMO, getattr or setattr should all report metadata corrupt in
dmesg(command fail)after the attr leaf block gets corrupted.
I think it should be a common part, not only for this case also for
other attr corrupt case ie xfs/125. We should add getattr for them after
attr corrupt to avoid similar problem occurs other places.
what do you think about this?
ps: I should update my commit message for this.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>
> --D
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> tests/xfs/126 | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/xfs/126 b/tests/xfs/126
>> index c3a74b1c..5496f3d7 100755
>> --- a/tests/xfs/126
>> +++ b/tests/xfs/126
>> @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
>> # Create and populate an XFS filesystem, corrupt a leaf xattr's data extent,
>> # then see how the kernel and xfs_repair deal with it.
>> #
>> +# It is also a regression test for kernel commit:
>> +# a1de97fe296c ("xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname")
>> +#
>> +
>> . ./common/preamble
>> _begin_fstest fuzzers
>>
>> @@ -69,7 +73,7 @@ done
>>
>> echo "+ mount image&& modify xattr"
>> if _try_scratch_mount>> $seqres.full 2>&1; then
>> -
>> + getfattr "${SCRATCH_MNT}/attrfile" -n "user.x00000000" 2> /dev/null&& _fail "got corrupt xattr"
>> setfattr -x "user.x00000000" "${SCRATCH_MNT}/attrfile" 2> /dev/null&& _fail "modified corrupt xattr"
>> umount "${SCRATCH_MNT}"
>> fi
>> --
>> 2.23.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-06 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-25 5:13 [PATCH v2] xfs/126: Add a getxattr opeartion after corrupted xattr Yang Xu
2021-11-26 23:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-06 1:41 ` xuyang2018.jy [this message]
2022-01-17 8:22 ` [PATCH v3] xfs/12[4-6]: Add getfattr operation after xattr corrupted Yang Xu
2022-01-23 13:09 ` Eryu Guan
2022-01-27 3:02 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-01-27 4:59 ` Zorro Lang
2022-01-30 2:44 ` xuyang2018.jy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61D648E5.3010209@fujitsu.com \
--to=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).