From: "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/220: fix quotarm syscall test
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:55:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61D64C1C.1090602@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61D64732.3030505@fujitsu.com>
on 2022/1/6 9:34, xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com wrote:
> on 2022/1/6 3:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> From: Darrick J. Wong<djwong@kernel.org>
>>
>> In commit 6ba125c9, we tried to adjust this fstest to deal with the
>> removal of the ability to turn off quota accounting via the Q_XQUOTAOFF
>> system call.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the changes made to this test make it nonfunctional on
>> those newer kernels, since the Q_XQUOTARM command returns EINVAL if
>> quota accounting is turned on, and the changes filter out the EINVAL
>> error string.
>>
>> Doing this wasn't /incorrect/, because, very narrowly speaking, the
>> intent of this test is to guard against Q_XQUOTARM returning ENOSYS when
>> quota has been enabled. However, this also means that we no longer test
>> Q_XQUOTARM's ability to truncate the quota files at all.
>>
>> So, fix this test to deal with the loss of quotaoff in the same way that
>> the others do -- if accounting is still enabled after the 'off' command,
>> cycle the mount so that Q_XQUOTARM actually truncates the files.
>>
>> While we're at it, enhance the test to check that XQUOTARM actually
>> truncated the quota files.
>>
>> Fixes: 6ba125c9 ("xfs/220: avoid failure when disabling quota accounting is not supported")
>> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong<djwong@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> tests/xfs/220 | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/xfs/220 b/tests/xfs/220
>> index 241a7abd..cfa90d3a 100755
>> --- a/tests/xfs/220
>> +++ b/tests/xfs/220
>> @@ -52,14 +52,28 @@ _scratch_mkfs_xfs>/dev/null 2>&1
>> # mount with quotas enabled
>> _scratch_mount -o uquota
>>
>> -# turn off quota and remove space allocated to the quota files
>> +# turn off quota accounting...
>> +$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c off $SCRATCH_DEV
>> +
>> +# ...but if the kernel doesn't support turning off accounting, remount with
>> +# noquota option to turn it off...
>> +if $XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'state -u' $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q 'Accounting: ON'; then
>> + _scratch_unmount
>> + _scratch_mount -o noquota
>> +fi
>> +
>> +before_freesp=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
>> +
>> +# ...and remove space allocated to the quota files
>> # (this used to give wrong ENOSYS returns in 2.6.31)
>> -#
>> -# The sed expression below replaces a notrun to cater for kernels that have
>> -# removed the ability to disable quota accounting at runtime. On those
>> -# kernel this test is rather useless, and in a few years we can drop it.
>> -$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c off -c remove $SCRATCH_DEV 2>&1 | \
>> - sed -e '/XFS_QUOTARM: Invalid argument/d'
>> +$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c remove $SCRATCH_DEV
>> +
>> +# Make sure we actually freed the space used by dquot 0
>> +after_freesp=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
>> +if [ $before_freesp -ge $after_freesp ]; then
>> + echo "before: $before_freesp; after: $after_freesp">> $seqres.full
> I prefer to move this info outside the if. So even case pass, I still
> can see the difference in seqres.full.
>> + echo "expected more free space after Q_XQUOTARM"
> Do you forget to add this into 220.out?
Sorry, _get_available_space is designed for free space. I misunderstand it.
Just one nit, can we move the $seqres.full code outside the if?
after_freesp=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
delta=$(($after_freesp - $before_freesp))
echo "before_freesp: $before_freesp; after_freesp: $after_freesp, delta:
$delta" >> $seqres.full
if [ $delta -le 0 ]; then
echo "expected more free space after Q_XQUOTARM"
fi
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>
>
> Also, I try this patch and add some output about delta.
> It seems before_value greater than after value.
>
> #Make sure we actually freed the space used by dquot 0
> after_freesp=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
> delta=$(($before_freesp - $after_freesp))
> echo "before: $before_freesp; after: $after_freesp, delta: $delta">>
> $seqres.full
> if [ $delta -ge 0 ]; then
> echo "expected more free space after Q_XQUOTARM"
> fi
>
> MOUNT_OPTIONS = -o defaults
> before: 21280804864; after: 21280808960, delta: -4096
>
>
> Best Regards
> Yang Xu
>> +fi
>>
>> # and unmount again
>> _scratch_unmount
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-06 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-05 19:53 [PATCH] xfs/220: fix quotarm syscall test Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-06 1:34 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-01-06 1:55 ` xuyang2018.jy [this message]
2022-01-06 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61D64C1C.1090602@fujitsu.com \
--to=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).