public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhangyi <yizhang089@gmail.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>, Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>,
	overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] overlay: correct fsck.overlay exit code
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:22:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66460ae9-3552-5730-9970-70f229475a5e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjrf8mcUtcxwmhpg4Y4m3u0PXC2QNc+s3tkUiPN3anzvw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2018/10/18 12:37, Amir Goldstein Wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:37 AM zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> On 2018/10/16 17:45, Amir Goldstein Wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:32 AM zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>> Please consider the name _overlay_repair_dirs() with reference to
>>> _repair_scratch_fs(), which is used for roughly the same purpose.
>>>
>> _run_check_fsck() is helper used to test fsck and may expect to return
>> "error" exit code when we do exception tests(see patch 4), but
>> _repair_scratch_fs() always want to return "correct" exit code.
>>
> Right. so perhaps we need _overlay_repair_dirs() as a convenience
> helper for things like the stress test and also related to another
> comment about expecting return 0 is too fragile.
>
>>> BTW, the tests generic/330 generic/332 when run with -overlay
>>> over xfs with reflink support seem to call _repair_scratch_fs() which does:
>>>          # Let's hope fsck -y suffices...
>>>          fsck -t $FSTYP -y $SCRATCH_DEV 2>&1
>>>          local res=$?
>>>          case $res in
>>>          0|1|2)
>>>                  res=0
>>>                  ;;
>>>          *)
>>>                  _dump_err2 "fsck.$FSTYP failed, err=$res"
>>>
>>> How come fsck.overlay is not complaining about missing arguments??
>>>
>>> The rest of the generic tests that call _repair_scratch_fs() have
>>> _require_dm_target() which _require_block_device(), so don't run with overlay.
>>>
>>> If you do sort this out and add overlay support to
>>> _repair_scratch_fs() its probably
>>> worth replacing 0|1|2) with FSCK_ constants.
>>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out, I think we do something like below can fix
>> this problem, what do you think?
> I am puzzled about why those tests do NOT fail when fsck.overlay is given
> incorrect args??
>
Oh, it's _dump_err2() helper's fault, it should be

--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ _dump_err_cont()
  _dump_err2()
  {
      _err_msg="$*"
-    >2& echo "$_err_msg"
+    >&2 echo "$_err_msg"
  }

Thanks,
Yi.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-19  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-16  7:45 [PATCH v2 0/4] overlay: enhance fsck.overlay test cases zhangyi (F)
2018-10-16  7:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] overlay: correct fsck.overlay exit code zhangyi (F)
2018-10-16  9:45   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-18  2:37     ` zhangyi (F)
2018-10-18  4:37       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-18 16:22         ` zhangyi [this message]
2018-10-18  4:54   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-16  7:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] overlay: fix exit code for some fsck.overlay valid cases zhangyi (F)
2018-10-16  9:26   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-18  3:42     ` zhangyi (F)
2018-10-18  4:44       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-19 12:36         ` zhangyi (F)
2018-10-19 14:00           ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-16  7:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] overlay: add fsck.overlay stress test zhangyi (F)
2018-10-16 10:07   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-18  3:48     ` zhangyi (F)
2018-10-16  7:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] overlay: add fsck.overlay exception tests zhangyi (F)
2018-10-16 13:29   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-16  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] overlay: enhance fsck.overlay test cases Amir Goldstein
2018-10-16 12:39   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-18  3:50     ` zhangyi (F)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66460ae9-3552-5730-9970-70f229475a5e@gmail.com \
    --to=yizhang089@gmail.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox