From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCEBC433EF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EB161AEF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355442AbhJAUr5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:47:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1355332AbhJAUr4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:47:56 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20AE5C061775 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 13:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id b78so13156504iof.2 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 13:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3DybLe1RpzKsxnKzIBemCIAZ6AMadRGjezFEaPOKcoc=; b=0Mqo6jiy7LSz9NJceKhYYwz+bqIpqn86YEP1lSboYwJsyrCWFDv/zPuusAreK8LrbG dOBy6xQbCFWUnsJObIKSGUolFp5JpxVy+iZDnwfjQwkq9+j/kgq9Cfk/PddfFBicXVBe 0rd4X6Fx2ne9F0PRJlCIOOIS/mZmvNqpFOZf1QSaBXxmORDRUi5cQDOZ7zlkH1Y+cgvA PMrEFuspnAugsz6ebvjI5S77M7PiekhFkEoeKAohXo+9ql6L2QtTwpe/hMrsKT4Z/G2l 1mUOynhnX9wo/GgXxj7XF6oSFe6EhnG1TpL6naVXtsttClWegRM/ili06+pB91QSIPtq KFDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3DybLe1RpzKsxnKzIBemCIAZ6AMadRGjezFEaPOKcoc=; b=fEV3t9v1HSHa1hXkMkIZVClilfuvNsiNY+FDurR7ZVDi8CjBH1oNgwUoH9PLrx9pk0 RMveV8KzVwSvx6YV8v76mwgHYkABnQKh769GlZv5E2oaFjrib/lo0/+svVFH3CXXqfFv lVfI6+N83rdHREOE8ibLUxpDpunIoTCP1B/LkIYGBS0S5VR/raxj9yIJhgwHh1pjMgwV ZY+5z5cidqOZSqCk/UfrUB5p8AjsFWiAsOwHlrFUaKxQVW2S9jI+Ohtu0OpQu4IA40i+ 1dd5pvv9tpUdsHtTOeNVhM5jSm/+Loqut+pg4PQnm5ZktikhNwb3l/aRV1FhkWkxnGxg gDrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QUM5mtOf3W+Y/R22buIXJ1JlcbEU+8gCdPzHmSrsMxksM6/kJ jJt9hzHJLQOXTJ4eKj1NlDohww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRF3HtTAPQy1InC/PX0rp3wBc3cCHRSp5RngTsCHkXQyq7cht+lu3OYkDNBl265bIMoy1VTA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8b52:: with SMTP id n79mr40121iod.8.1633121171288; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 13:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.116] ([66.219.217.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o3sm4144856ilh.5.2021.10.01.13.46.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Oct 2021 13:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: generic/095 failing in ext4 and xfs To: Luis Henriques , fstests@vger.kernel.org, fio@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <882f4c20-2e21-219b-0ca3-7e215e2d7cfa@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 14:46:09 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On 10/1/21 11:11 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: > Hi! > > I'm seeing generic/095 failing both with ext4 and xfs (but not on btrfs). > Here's what I'm getting: > > # cat results/generic/095.out.bad > QA output created by 095 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: read offset=51200, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: read offset=133120, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file2: Invalid argument: write offset=92160, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file2: Invalid argument: write offset=158720, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file2: Invalid argument: write offset=513024, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file2: Invalid argument: write offset=33792, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file2: Invalid argument: write offset=449536, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: read offset=45056, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: read offset=30720, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: write offset=222208, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: read offset=342016, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: write offset=177152, buflen=1024 > fio: pid=4090, got signal=11 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: write offset=43008, buflen=1024 > fio: io_u error on file /tmp/mnt/scratch/file1: Invalid argument: write offset=308224, buflen=1024 > fio: pid=4086, got signal=11 > Silence is golden > > This was for ext4 but the output for xfs is similar. Since fio is getting > killed I suspect this may be an issue with this tool. Thus I'm sending > this to both fio and fstests mailing-lists. > > I'm using a 5.15-rc3 kernel and fio-3.28. Is anyone else seeing something > similar? Hmm, do older versions fail? I see Ted suggested that 3.27 doesn't, can you give that a go? If that does work, would be great if you could try and bisect it. -- Jens Axboe