From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA9A158DDC for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721827503; cv=none; b=Pm1xt118QtQH71SKruiMY6Z2zYJgOofalFjQpfK7s4OAGH1aNSikxwEcTr/WinR1qtmI/VyzjBHTPt9tHRh3CrpGyshQ54ee8z0QTnQCp9fXFEArHtL4GoZUUPBolicE9mtV/HwuI8Aap44rhTO2vqzllbGPeKyBRW0QaVGacpE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721827503; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tOtyl6CMe+zOwJ0wDfVq43MA3PQ8/fOF08QjWnTAnd8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Emf+Pa0dbrgXZ+hJhNFtIShaHuhjy5CARTRKGO+sMaz9CMkGsWFT3oGdW/4RcjQfENvnpzxgsInrKuIUE3qpcNm5MRO9jK8zyjtDE2l8Y/zeF5pHvn+x16AtuVF7u2Nyuc8WTcAlo8fNvpDjn20HmK+zUsUG6xjGQ29xQmb3GIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.252]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WTZW61v2WzxTlF; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:24:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.220]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEBBE18009D; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:24:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.177.210] (10.174.177.210) by kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:24:52 +0800 Message-ID: <8ce6def6-080e-eb2d-2ba9-32eabeac58c8@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:24:51 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/732: don't run it on tmpfs To: Christoph Hellwig CC: , , , , , References: <20240720071323.2893437-1-yangerkun@huawei.com> From: yangerkun In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.220) Hi, Sorry for the delay relay(something happened, and cannot use pc before...). 在 2024/7/22 22:20, Christoph Hellwig 写道: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:13:23PM +0800, Yang Erkun wrote: >> Like what 4fd042e0465c("generic/732: don't run it on NFS") say, the same >> options for tmpfs won't share the same backend. Skip it for tmpfs. >> >> # real QA test starts here >> -_supported_fs ^nfs ^overlay >> +_supported_fs ^nfs ^overlay ^tmpfs > > Can you please spell out the explanation here? > > We should not have a _supported_fs call without a comment explaining it. > > Yeah! Thanks for your reminder, will do it with v2(maybe until last week I can do it).