FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Weird behaviour with cifs in xfstests shutdown tests
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 09:26:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <971805.1682584013@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)

I'm seeing some failures running xfstests on cifs when it comes to tests that
do a shutdown of the filesystem, generic/392 for example:

generic/392       [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /root/xfstests-dev/results//smb3/generic/392.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/392.out   2021-05-25 13:27:50.000000000 +0100
    +++ /root/xfstests-dev/results//smb3/generic/392.out.bad    2023-04-27 09:07:42.402657080 +0100
    @@ -1,11 +1,67 @@
     QA output created by 392
     ==== i_size 1024 test with fsync ====
    +stat: cannot statx '/xfstest.scratch/testfile': Input/output error
    +Before:  "b: 8194 s: 4195328 a: 2023-04-27 09:07:39.410675400 +0100 m: 2023-04-27 09:07:39.410675400 +0100 c: 2023-04-27 09:07:39.410675400 +0100"
    +After : 
    +rm: cannot remove '/xfstest.scratch/testfile': Input/output error
     ==== i_size 4096 test with fsync ====
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /root/xfstests-dev/tests/generic/392.out /root/xfstests-dev/results//smb3/generic/392.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)

The problem appears to be that the CIFS_MOUNT_SHUTDOWN persists if there's
another cifs mount from the same server present.  So in generic/392 it does:

	before=`stat "$stat_opt" $testfile`

	$XFS_IO_PROG -c "$sync_mode" $testfile | _filter_xfs_io
	_scratch_shutdown | tee -a $seqres.full
	_scratch_cycle_mount

	after=`stat "$stat_opt" $testfile`

which cycles the *scratch* mount, but leaves the test mount still mounted and
then the 'after' stat fails with EIO.

Testing this by hand:

  mount //192.168.6.1/scratch /xfstest.scratch/ -o user=shares,pass=...;\
  touch /xfstest.scratch/testfile; \
  stat /xfstest.scratch/testfile; \
  ./src/godown /xfstest.scratch/; \
  umount /xfstest.scratch/; \
  mount //192.168.6.1/scratch /xfstest.scratch/ -o user=shares,pass=...; \
  stat /xfstest.scratch/testfile

works, but will fail if I do:

  mount //192.168.6.1/test /xfstest.test/ -o user=shares,pass=...;

first.

Interestingly, the two mounts have different device numbers according to stat,
so they would appear to have different superblocks.

David


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-04-27  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=971805.1682584013@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox