FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Test generic/614
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:51:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3usnwK3MFba2kEw@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H5fCW9ViD3R8pX9ekLrtF-NpaqaEX+SjmVH09jRsT53dQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:32:22PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:37 PM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Filipe!
> 
> Hi Jan!
> 
> >
> > I have noticed test generic/614 is failing on ext2. The test creates sparse
> > file, maps it, and writes data to it through mmap. Then it checks i_blocks
> > has increased. However for ext2 (and other trivial filesystems supporting
> > sparse files but not implementing delayed allocation) this is bound to fail
> > because i_block gets incremented only during page writeback.
> >
> > So would your btrfs test make sense even if we called fsync(2) before
> > checking stat(2) results?
> 
> Calling fsync before calling stat would defeat the purpose of the test.
> I.e. the test would pass both with and without the btrfs fix.
> 
> So maybe adding the following to the test:
> 
> _supported_fs ^ext2
> 
> And listing all other filesystems not supporting delayed allocation?
> 
> Or adding a _require_delayed_allocation() helper to make it _notrun().

_require_scratch_delalloc() ?

--D

> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >                                                                 Honza
> > --
> > Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> > SUSE Labs, CR

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-21 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 12:36 Test generic/614 Jan Kara
2022-11-21 13:32 ` Filipe Manana
2022-11-21 16:18   ` Jan Kara
2022-11-21 16:51   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-11-22 12:52     ` Jan Kara
2022-11-22 14:10       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3usnwK3MFba2kEw@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox