From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40431C433EF for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D04B6139E for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230477AbhJDKRu (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:17:50 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:55134 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229478AbhJDKRu (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:17:50 -0400 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC8D22260; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:16:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1633342560; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5aalXRYL5ZbZF7MRVQme3tap8+8hbUqGjls8uIghGIc=; b=ZoWETEUES6wjS8jVomju6fl0GAeANXX2olpVX1oDY2oc+OSghYclaQxllOuI7LDpavRBSc 0lUdSKLCczSRxMv2Fw80FW+xyN2YcdC/jAIaSEVkb/MSSyy6PIpmOY6oE6kJB+GzeS4Gjd 5hLjXaUsBOMkdLWeSpDF6y8sb/HfUIU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1633342560; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5aalXRYL5ZbZF7MRVQme3tap8+8hbUqGjls8uIghGIc=; b=YpbKlZIg+gAx7Ui82JEgLLiZqf5SX1qLKOUpuYZtBRi8Lc7scg+DAsVdjbqyVsZYASkShc W1SfphsagvxCcVBQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB5513CDE; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id /6c8FGDUWmH2VwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:16:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (brahms [local]) by brahms (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id e310c847; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:15:59 +0100 From: Luis Henriques To: Jens Axboe Cc: Theodore Ts'o , fstests@vger.kernel.org, fio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: generic/095 failing in ext4 and xfs Message-ID: References: <882f4c20-2e21-219b-0ca3-7e215e2d7cfa@kernel.dk> <86ee93vijj.fsf@orpheus.olymp> <6f867fa0-c3e9-6f65-d97f-4779c029ef81@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 11:08:29AM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 08:59:57AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 10/2/21 4:16 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: > > > "Theodore Ts'o" writes: > > > > > >> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 02:46:09PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hmm, do older versions fail? I see Ted suggested that 3.27 doesn't, can > > >>> you give that a go? If that does work, would be great if you could try > > >>> and bisect it. > > >> > > >> I just tried fio 3.28, and it worked for me. So I don't think it's > > >> fio. > > > > > > Awesome, thank you both for checking it out. So, it's definitely > > > something in my test environment. > > > > > >> Luis, could it be related to a kernel config option? > > > > > > Yeah, it could be. I've tested this on a rolling release (openSUSE TW), > > > so it's definitely quite different from Debian 10. It may take me a bit > > > to figure out what's going on, but I'll start with this kernel config and > > > report back any finding. > > > > > > Again, thank you both for confirming it's working on your side. > > > > Do you have a core file from fio? Would be interesting to get a > > backtrace from it. > > Ok, not a lot of progress from my end yet, but here's some info gathered > with gdb from the core file: > > #0 0x000056505966b361 in io_completed (td=0x7f2b0c5437a0, io_u_ptr=0x7ffec2403e48, icd=0x7ffec2403e60) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/io_u.c:2012 > #1 0x000056505966b922 in ios_completed (icd=0x7ffec2403e60, td=0x7f2b0c5437a0) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/io_u.c:2086 > #2 io_u_queued_complete (td=0x7f2b0c5437a0, min_evts=) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/io_u.c:2145 > #3 0x0000565059680e88 in do_io (td=0x7f2b0c5437a0, bytes_done=0x7ffec2404070) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/backend.c:1176 > #4 0x000056505968a8ee in thread_main (data=data@entry=0x56505ae43510) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/backend.c:1870 > #5 0x000056505968ca48 in run_threads (sk_out=0x0) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/backend.c:2460 > #6 0x000056505968cb55 in fio_backend (sk_out=0x0) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/backend.c:2597 > #7 fio_backend (sk_out=0x0) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/backend.c:2558 > #8 0x000056505962fd97 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7ffec240c448, envp=) at /usr/src/debug/fio-3.28-1.1.x86_64/fio.c:60 > > And here's the io_completed() code where the crash occurs: > > 2007 if (io_u->resid) { > 2008 io_u->xfer_buflen = io_u->resid; > 2009 io_u->xfer_buf += bytes; > 2010 io_u->offset += bytes; > 2011 td->ts.short_io_u[io_u->ddir]++; > 2012 if (io_u->offset < io_u->file->real_file_size) { > 2013 requeue_io_u(td, io_u_ptr); > 2014 return; > 2015 } > 2016 } I forgot to include the kernel log. The page cache error seems relevant, and, as I said before, I'm seeing it both on ext4 and xfs: [ 38.014790] fio[762]: segfault at 30 ip 000056505966b361 sp 00007ffec2403df0 error 4 in fio[56505962e000+84000] [ 38.016320] Code: c1 48 85 c0 74 2e 48 89 45 68 48 8b 45 40 48 63 55 2c 4c 01 4d 60 4c 01 c8 48 89 45 40 49 83 84 d4 70 5d 02 00 01 48 8b 55 20 <48> 3b 42 30 0f 82 75 026 [ 38.016839] Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O. Possible data corruption due to collision with buffered I/O! [ 38.019520] fio[760]: segfault at 30 ip 000056505966b361 sp 00007ffec2403df0 error 4 in fio[56505962e000+84000] [ 38.020543] File: /mnt/scratch/file1 PID: 754 Comm: fio [ 38.022056] Code: c1 48 85 c0 74 2e 48 89 45 68 48 8b 45 40 48 63 55 2c 4c 01 4d 60 4c 01 c8 48 89 45 40 49 83 84 d4 70 5d 02 00 01 48 8b 55 20 <48> 3b 42 30 0f 82 75 026 [ 38.052142] fio[761]: segfault at 30 ip 000056505966b361 sp 00007ffec2403df0 error 4 in fio[56505962e000+84000] [ 38.053545] Code: c1 48 85 c0 74 2e 48 89 45 68 48 8b 45 40 48 63 55 2c 4c 01 4d 60 4c 01 c8 48 89 45 40 49 83 84 d4 70 5d 02 00 01 48 8b 55 20 <48> 3b 42 30 0f 82 75 026 [ 38.058111] fio[759]: segfault at 30 ip 000056505966b361 sp 00007ffec2403df0 error 4 in fio[56505962e000+84000] [ 38.059511] Code: c1 48 85 c0 74 2e 48 89 45 68 48 8b 45 40 48 63 55 2c 4c 01 4d 60 4c 01 c8 48 89 45 40 49 83 84 d4 70 5d 02 00 01 48 8b 55 20 <48> 3b 42 30 0f 82 75 026 [ 38.065638] fio[758]: segfault at 30 ip 000056505966b361 sp 00007ffec2403df0 error 4 in fio[56505962e000+84000] [ 38.067055] Code: c1 48 85 c0 74 2e 48 89 45 68 48 8b 45 40 48 63 55 2c 4c 01 4d 60 4c 01 c8 48 89 45 40 49 83 84 d4 70 5d 02 00 01 48 8b 55 20 <48> 3b 42 30 0f 82 75 026 > > In terms of why it's failing, a guess would be that your device is using 4k > > sectors and the test is trying to do 1k aligned dio. That would fail, but > > it should not cause fio to crash... > > > > -- > > Jens Axboe > > Cheers, -- Luís