From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic: test COW writeback failure when overlapping non-shared blocks
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:09:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXG6/f7tAV4+zYfy@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021184005.GV24307@magnolia>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:40:05AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:39:59PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Test that COW writeback that overlaps non-shared delalloc blocks
> > does not leave around stale delalloc blocks on I/O failure. This
> > triggers assert failures and free space accounting corruption on
> > XFS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This test targets the problem addressed by the following patch in XFS:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20211021163330.1886516-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > tests/generic/651 | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/generic/651.out | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tests/generic/651
> > create mode 100644 tests/generic/651.out
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/651 b/tests/generic/651
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..8d4e6728
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/651
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test 651
> > +#
> > +# Test that COW writeback that overlaps non-shared delalloc blocks does not
> > +# leave around stale delalloc blocks on I/O failure. This triggers assert
> > +# failures and free space accounting corruption on XFS.
> > +#
> > +. ./common/preamble
> > +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > + _cleanup_flakey
> > + cd /
> > + rm -r -f $tmp.*
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Import common functions.
> > +. ./common/reflink
> > +. ./common/dmflakey
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +_supported_fs generic
> > +_require_scratch_reflink
> > +_require_flakey_with_error_writes
>
> _require_cp_reflink
>
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> > +_init_flakey
> > +_mount_flakey
> > +
> > +# create two files that share a single block
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite 4k 4k" $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 >> $seqres.full
>
> Please use:
>
> blksz=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> $XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite $blksz $blksz" $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 >> $seqres.full
>
> So that this test will work properly on filesystems with bs > 4k.
>
Yeah, I'll fix the various hardcoded sizes. Thanks.
> > +cp --reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 $SCRATCH_MNT/file2
>
> Nit: This could be shortened to use the _cp_reflink helper, though it
> doesn't really matter to me if you do.
>
Didn't know we had it. I'll look into it.
> > +# Perform a buffered write across the shared and non-shared blocks. On XFS, this
> > +# creates a COW fork extent that covers the shared block as well as the just
>
> Ah, the reason why there's a cow fork extent covering the delalloc
> reservation is due to the default cow extent size hint, right? In that
> case, you need:
>
Yeah..
> _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize"
> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
>
> to ensure that the speculative cow preallocation actually gets set up.
> Otherwise, I think test won't reproduce the bug if the test config has
> -d cowextsize=1 in the mkfs options.
>
.. but then we aren't susceptible to the problem, right?
I sometimes waffle on whether it's better for a test to create a
problematic situation and test it, or run on the configuration specified
by the user and test a particular scenario against that. Maybe the
former makes more sense in this very specific test case, but then I
suppose "cowextsize blksz*2" (or whatever large enough value) is
probably more robust than "cowextsize 0" (which I assume means "default"
and thus can change, right)?
Brian
> > +# created non-shared delalloc block. Fail the writeback to verify that all
> > +# delayed allocation is cleaned up properly.
> > +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ERROR_WRITES
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 8k" -c fsync $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 >> $seqres.full
>
> $((2 * blksz)), not 8k
>
> Other than that, this looks reasonable to me. I'll go look at the fix
> patch now. :)
>
> --D
>
> > +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES
> > +
> > +# Try a post-fail reflink and then unmount. Both of these are known to produce
> > +# errors and/or assert failures on XFS if we trip over a stale delalloc block.
> > +cp --reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 $SCRATCH_MNT/file3
> > +_unmount_flakey
> > +
> > +# success, all done
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/651.out b/tests/generic/651.out
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..bd44c80c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/651.out
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +QA output created by 651
> > +fsync: Input/output error
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 16:39 [PATCH] generic: test COW writeback failure when overlapping non-shared blocks Brian Foster
2021-10-21 18:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-21 19:09 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-10-21 21:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXG6/f7tAV4+zYfy@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox