fstests.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] btrfs: test btrfs specific fsverity corruption
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:58:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yi/Wq/e7qv0jcQIb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de58122e6cb1712fa5304f0759b40b36351dfc36.1644883592.git.boris@bur.io>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 04:09:55PM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> diff --git a/common/verity b/common/verity
> index 38eea157..eec8ae72 100644
> --- a/common/verity
> +++ b/common/verity
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>  #
>  # Functions for setting up and testing fs-verity
>  
> +. common/btrfs

Why does common/btrfs need to be included here?

> +# Check for userspace tools needed to corrupt verity data or metadata.
> +_require_fsverity_corruption()
> +{
> +	_require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
> +	if [ $FSTYP == "btrfs" ]; then
> +		_require_btrfs_corrupt_block
> +	fi
> +}

Which function(s), specifically, is this function a prerequisite for?  Based on
the name, it sounds like it would be a prerequisite for calling
_fsv_scratch_corrupt_bytes() and _fsv_scratch_corrupt_merkle_tree().  But that's
apparently not the case, seeing as generic/576 calls
_fsv_scratch_corrupt_bytes() but doesn't call _require_fsverity_corruption(),
and your new test btrfs/290 calls _require_fsverity_corruption() but doesn't
call either _fsv_scratch_corrupt_bytes() or _fsv_scratch_corrupt_merkle_tree().

So, the purpose of this function is unclear.

Perhaps it should be a prerequisite for all _fsv_scratch_corrupt*() functions,
and btrfs/290 should check for btrfs-corrupt-block directly?

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-15  0:09 [PATCH v6 0/4] tests for btrfs fsverity Boris Burkov
2022-02-15  0:09 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] btrfs: test btrfs specific fsverity corruption Boris Burkov
2022-03-14 23:58   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-03-15 22:02     ` Boris Burkov
2022-02-15  0:09 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] generic/574: corrupt btrfs merkle tree data Boris Burkov
2022-03-15  0:00   ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-15  0:09 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] btrfs: test verity orphans with dmlogwrites Boris Burkov
2022-02-15  0:09 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] generic: test fs-verity EFBIG scenarios Boris Burkov
2022-03-15  2:16   ` Eric Biggers
2022-03-15 22:06     ` Boris Burkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yi/Wq/e7qv0jcQIb@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).