From: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: generic/353 should accomodate other pwrite behaviors
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:00:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPIKseY4VfX8IFmi@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901154840.vweyyglsmx47aw6c@zlang-mailbox>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:48:40PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:50:56AM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> > xfs_io pwrite issues a series of block size writes, but there is no
> > guarantee that the resulting extent(s) will be singular or contiguous.
> > This behavior is acceptable, but the test is flawed in that it expects
> > a single extent for a pwrite.
> >
> > Modify test to use actual blocksize for pwrite and reflink. Also
> > modify it to accommodate pwrite and reflink that produce different
> > mapping results.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tests/generic/353 | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> > tests/generic/353.out | 14 --------------
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/353 b/tests/generic/353
> > index 9a1471bd..03b038a6 100755
> > --- a/tests/generic/353
> > +++ b/tests/generic/353
> > @@ -29,31 +29,32 @@ _require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
> > _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> > _scratch_mount
> >
> > -blocksize=64k
> > +blocksize=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> > +
> > file1="$SCRATCH_MNT/file1"
> > file2="$SCRATCH_MNT/file2"
> > +extmap1="$SCRATCH_MNT/extmap1"
> > +extmap2="$SCRATCH_MNT/extmap2"
> >
> > # write the initial file
> > -_pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $blocksize $file1 | _filter_xfs_io
> > +_pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $blocksize $file1 > /dev/null
> >
> > # reflink initial file
> > -_reflink_range $file1 0 $file2 0 $blocksize | _filter_xfs_io
> > +_reflink_range $file1 0 $file2 0 $blocksize > /dev/null
> >
> > # check their fiemap to make sure it's correct
> > -echo "before sync:"
> > -echo "$file1" | _filter_scratch
> > -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file1 | _filter_fiemap_flags
> > -echo "$file2" | _filter_scratch
> > -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file2 | _filter_fiemap_flags
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file1 | _filter_fiemap_flags > $extmap1
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file2 | _filter_fiemap_flags > $extmap2
> > +
> > +cmp -s $extmap1 $extmap2 || echo "mismatched extent maps before sync"
> >
> > # sync and recheck, to make sure the fiemap doesn't change just
> > # due to sync
> > sync
> > -echo "after sync:"
> > -echo "$file1" | _filter_scratch
> > -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file1 | _filter_fiemap_flags
> > -echo "$file2" | _filter_scratch
> > -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file2 | _filter_fiemap_flags
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file1 | _filter_fiemap_flags > $extmap1
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file2 | _filter_fiemap_flags > $extmap2
> > +
> > +cmp -s $extmap1 $extmap2 || echo "mismatched extent maps after sync"
> >
> > # success, all done
> > status=0
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/353.out b/tests/generic/353.out
> > index 4f6e0b92..86cece4f 100644
> > --- a/tests/generic/353.out
> > +++ b/tests/generic/353.out
> > @@ -1,15 +1 @@
> > QA output created by 353
> > -wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
> > -XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> > -linked 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
> > -XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> > -before sync:
> > -SCRATCH_MNT/file1
> > -0: [0..127]: shared|last
> > -SCRATCH_MNT/file2
> > -0: [0..127]: shared|last
> > -after sync:
> > -SCRATCH_MNT/file1
> > -0: [0..127]: shared|last
> > -SCRATCH_MNT/file2
> > -0: [0..127]: shared|last
>
> If you hope to remove all output messages, we generally have a
> "Silence is golden".
I thought about that and forgot to do it. I'll send a v2.
Thanks-
Bill
>
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-01 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 12:50 [PATCH] fstests: generic/353 should accomodate other pwrite behaviors Bill O'Donnell
2023-08-31 16:46 ` Bill O'Donnell
2023-09-01 15:48 ` Zorro Lang
2023-09-01 16:00 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPIKseY4VfX8IFmi@redhat.com \
--to=bodonnel@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox