From: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] generic/459: improve shutdown/read-only check to accommodate bcachefs
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:36:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWeu623M2xNW7IlH@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129201614.347901-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 03:16:14PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> generic/459 occasionally fails on bcachefs because the deliberately
> induced I/O errors caused by exhausting the overprovisioned thin
> pool can lead to filesystem shutdown. This test considers this
> expected behavior on certain fs', but only checks for the ext4
> remount read-only behavior. bcachefs does a similar emergency
> read-only transition in response to certain I/O errors, but it
> behaves more similar to an XFS shutdown and doesn't necessarily
> reflect "ro" state in the mount table (unless induced by userspace).
>
> Since the test already runs a touch command to help trigger the ext4
> error handling sequence, this can be tweaked to serve double duty
> and also more accurately detect read-only status on bcachefs.
> Refactor into a small helper, check for touch command failure, and
> consider the fs read-only if either that or the mount entry check
> indicates it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - Drop error filtering and just check touch failure.
> - Comment tweaks.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20231117144317.10882-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
>
> tests/generic/459 | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/459 b/tests/generic/459
> index 4dd7a43b..c3f0b2b0 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/459
> +++ b/tests/generic/459
> @@ -57,6 +57,24 @@ origpsize=200
> virtsize=300
> newpsize=300
>
> +# Check whether the filesystem has shutdown or remounted read-only. Shutdown
> +# behavior can differ based on filesystem and configuration. Some fs' may not
> +# have remounted without an additional write while others may have shutdown but
> +# do not necessarily reflect read-only state in the mount options. Check both
> +# here by first trying a simple write and following with an explicit ro check.
> +is_shutdown_or_ro()
> +{
> + ro=0
> +
> + # if the fs has not shutdown, this may help trigger a remount-ro
> + touch $SCRATCH_MNT/newfile > /dev/null 2>&1 || ro=1
> +
> + _fs_options /dev/mapper/$vgname-$snapname | grep -w "ro" > /dev/null
> + [ $? == 0 ] && ro=1
> +
> + echo $ro
> +}
> +
> # Ensure we have enough disk space
> _scratch_mkfs_sized $((350 * 1024 * 1024)) >>$seqres.full 2>&1
>
> @@ -113,13 +131,9 @@ ret=$?
> # - The filesystem stays in Read-Write mode, but can be frozen/thawed
> # without getting stuck.
> if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then
> - # freeze failed, filesystem should reject further writes and remount
> - # as readonly. Sometimes the previous write process won't trigger
> - # ro-remount, e.g. on ext3/4, do additional touch here to make sure
> - # filesystems see the metadata I/O error.
> - touch $SCRATCH_MNT/newfile >/dev/null 2>&1
> - ISRO=$(_fs_options /dev/mapper/$vgname-$snapname | grep -w "ro")
> - if [ -n "$ISRO" ]; then
> + # freeze failed, filesystem should reject further writes
> + ISRO=`is_shutdown_or_ro`
> + if [ $ISRO == 1 ]; then
> echo "Test OK"
> else
> echo "Freeze failed and FS isn't Read-Only. Test Failed"
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 20:16 [PATCH v2] generic/459: improve shutdown/read-only check to accommodate bcachefs Brian Foster
2023-11-29 21:36 ` Bill O'Donnell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWeu623M2xNW7IlH@redhat.com \
--to=bodonnel@redhat.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox