From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"fstests@vger.kernel.org" <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs "concurrency" change concerns
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:23:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajI9U04nCpf3u3l9@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajH4WwBqd_uyqQNj@shinmob>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 10:43:10AM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> Just FYI, here's my command line logs. nullb0 and nullb1 are 8GiB memory backed
> null_blk devices. I also tried each of "-d concurrency=0", "-l concurrency=0"
> and "-r concurrency=0" seperately, and observed the same failures. I used the
> kernel at xfs/for-next on Jun/12 and fstests tag v2026.05.17. The fstests
> alraday has the commit by Lukas ffc8bad17e5b ("xfs/21{6,7} Use default -l
> concurrency=0 on mkfs.xfs that supports it").
Both xfs/078 and xfs/216 don't actually use MKFS_OPTIONS :(
Can you try the quick hack patch below:
diff --git a/tests/xfs/078 b/tests/xfs/078
index 6057aeea1..c477f6cfb 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/078
+++ b/tests/xfs/078
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ _grow_loop()
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate $original" $LOOP_IMG
loop_dev=`_create_loop_device $LOOP_IMG $bsize`
- dparam=""
+ dparam="-d concurrency=0 -l concurrency=0 -r concurrency=0"
if [ -n "$agsize" ]; then
dparam="-d agsize=$agsize"
fi
diff --git a/tests/xfs/216 b/tests/xfs/216
index 1749647c1..ded3d30af 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/216
+++ b/tests/xfs/216
@@ -22,11 +22,7 @@ _cleanup()
_require_scratch
_scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null 2>&1
-if _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supports_concurrency -l >> $seqres.full 2>&1; then
- loop_mkfs_opts="-l concurrency=0"
-else
- loop_mkfs_opts=""
-fi
+loop_mkfs_opts="-d concurrency=0 -l concurrency=0 -r concurrency=0"
_scratch_mount
_require_loop
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 20:13 mkfs.xfs "concurrency" change concerns Eric Sandeen
2025-10-10 5:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-10 19:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-10 19:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-10 20:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-10-14 2:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-14 15:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-10-17 22:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-18 15:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-06-15 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-15 15:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-06-15 15:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-16 5:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-17 1:43 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-06-17 6:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-06-17 6:57 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-06-17 7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajI9U04nCpf3u3l9@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox