FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>, Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, aweits@rit.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] generic: add a test to ensure that page is properly filled before write
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 06:46:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf98acb991f0fbf9e44a06d65f40d0a927f653e6.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210707052750.GH60846@e18g06458.et15sqa>

On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 13:27 +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 06:56:41AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 19:04 +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 09:40:24AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > We had a broken optimization in cephfs and netfs lib that could cause
> > > > part of a page to be improperly zeroed-out when writing to an offset
> > > > that was beyond the EOF but in an existing page.
> > > > 
> > > > Add a simple test that would have caught this.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tests/generic/639     | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  tests/generic/639.out |  5 +++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100755 tests/generic/639
> > > >  create mode 100644 tests/generic/639.out
> > > > 
> > > > v3: adapt to new test template
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/639 b/tests/generic/639
> > > > new file mode 100755
> > > > index 000000000000..c30f7644a2fc
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tests/generic/639
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> > > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2021, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> > > > +#
> > > > +# FS QA Test No. 639
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Open a file and write a little data to it. Unmount (to clean out the cache)
> > > > +# and then mount again. Then write some data to it beyond the EOF and ensure
> > > > +# the result is correct.
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Prompted by a bug in ceph_write_begin that was fixed by commit 827a746f405d.
> > > > +#
> > > > +. ./common/preamble
> > > > +_begin_fstest auto quick rw
> > > > +
> > > > +# Import common functions.
> > > > +. ./common/filter
> > > > +
> > > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > > +_supported_fs generic
> > > > +_require_test
> > > > +
> > > > +testfile="$TEST_DIR/test_write_begin.$$"
> > > > +
> > > > +# write some data to file and fsync it out
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -q 0 32" $testfile
> > > 
> > > Looks good to me, if you've used this case to reproduce that issue.
> > > 
> > > Just one question, the comment says "fsync it out", does that mean we need an
> > > explicit "fsync" call (e.g. -c "pwrite -q 0 32" -c "fsync") to reproduce this
> > > bug? Or there's an implicit "fsync" somewhere?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > No, there is no implicit fsync. This is holdover from copy/paste that I
> > did from another test. The patch is already merged now, but if we expand
> > this test to cover other cases, I'll plan to clean up the comment then.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
> > 
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +# cycle the mount to clean out the pagecache
> > > > +_test_cycle_mount
> 
> I think this cycle mount accounts as an implicit fsync?
> 

Yes, the data should get synced out naturally during a umount. The
comment is still a bit misleading though since it may not happen until
this point.

> > > > +
> > > > +# now, write to the file (near the end)
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -q 32 32" $testfile
> > > > +
> > > > +# dump what we think is in there
> > > > +echo "The result should be 64 bytes filled with 0xcd:"
> > > > +hexdump -C $testfile
> > > > +
> > > > +status=0
> > > > +exit
> > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/639.out b/tests/generic/639.out
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..9bf0bac96864
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tests/generic/639.out
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > > > +QA output created by 639
> > > > +The result should be 64 bytes filled with 0xcd:
> > > > +00000000  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  |................|
> > > > +*
> > > > +00000040
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.31.1
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>


      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-02 13:40 [PATCH v3] generic: add a test to ensure that page is properly filled before write Jeff Layton
2021-07-05 11:04 ` Zorro Lang
2021-07-05 11:10   ` Zorro Lang
2021-07-06 10:56   ` Jeff Layton
2021-07-07  5:27     ` Eryu Guan
2021-07-07 10:46       ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf98acb991f0fbf9e44a06d65f40d0a927f653e6.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=aweits@rit.edu \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eguan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox