public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org,
	fdmanana@kernel.org, quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com, zlang@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: More test fixes for large block/node sizes
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:39:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1760332925.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com> (raw)

More btrfs test fixes. These tests were ran with 64k block size and they failed.
Individual patches have the details. A previous patch series with some other
test fixes was posted[1].

[v1] -> v2
1. Removed the patch for generic/371 (will send it in a separate series)
2. Added RB by Filipe in generic/562
3. Added RBs by Filipe and Zorro in btrfs/200
4. For btrfs/290 - Commit message changes and changing "196608" and "65536" to
   "192k" and "64k" respectively in the test script to make it more readable
   (Suggested by Filipe).

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1756101620.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
[v1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1758036285.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/

Nirjhar Roy (IBM) (3):
  generic/562: Make test compatible with block sizes till 64k
  btrfs/200: Make the test compatible with all supported block sizes
  btrfs/290: Make the test compatible with all supported block sizes

 tests/btrfs/200     |  8 ++++----
 tests/btrfs/200.out |  8 ++++----
 tests/btrfs/290     | 16 ++++++++--------
 tests/generic/562   |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-10-13  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-13  5:39 Nirjhar Roy (IBM) [this message]
2025-10-13  5:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] generic/562: Make test compatible with block sizes till 64k Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-13  5:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs/200: Make the test compatible with all supported block sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-13  5:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs/290: " Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-21  4:44   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-10-21 11:49     ` Filipe Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1760332925.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
    --to=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox