public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/168 verify device ready after device delete
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 14:01:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d563fc6b-faef-aed9-2c63-6b7c07f3c09d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180706044031.GD2780@desktop>



On 07/06/2018 12:40 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:47:53PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> This test case verifies if the device ready return success after the
>> device delete.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> 
> Looks fine to me overall, but I may need some helps from btrfs folks :)
> 
>> ---
>>   tests/btrfs/168     | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   tests/btrfs/168.out |  2 ++
>>   tests/btrfs/group   |  1 +
>>   3 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/168
>>   create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/168.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/168 b/tests/btrfs/168
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000000..cb5b8eb4b5a8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/168
>> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (C) 2018 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 168
>> +#
>> +# Test if btrfs is still reported ready after the device delete
>> +#
>> +# This could be fixed by the following kernel commit:
>> +#  btrfs: fix missing superblock update in the device delete commit transaction
>> +#
>> +seq=`basename $0`
>> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
>> +
>> +here=`pwd`
>> +tmp=/tmp/$$
>> +status=1	# failure is the default!
>> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> +	cd /
>> +	rm -f $tmp.*
>> +}
>> +
>> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>> +. ./common/rc
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
>> +rm -f $seqres.full
>> +
>> +# real QA test starts here
>> +
>> +# Modify as appropriate.
>> +_supported_fs btrfs
>> +_supported_os Linux
>> +_require_command "$BTRFS_TUNE_PROG" btrfstune
>> +_require_scratch_dev_pool 2
>> +
>> +_scratch_dev_pool_get 2
>> +dev_1=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $1}')
>> +dev_2=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $2}')
>> +
>> +# normal delete device and then check for ready
>> +run_check _scratch_pool_mkfs "-d single -m single"
>> +_scratch_mount
>> +run_check $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device delete $dev_1 $SCRATCH_MNT
>> +run_check $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device ready $dev_2
> 
> Why not "_run_btrfs_util_prog device delete ...."

  Err. will fix.

>> +
>> +_scratch_unmount
>> +# delete a seed device and then check for ready
>> +run_check $BTRFS_TUNE_PROG -S 1 $dev_2
>> +run_check _mount $dev_2 $SCRATCH_MNT
>> +_run_btrfs_util_prog device add -f $dev_1 $SCRATCH_MNT
> 
> Like this one?

> But I still prefer dropping run_check family functions completely, just
> using bare command, if the output of these commands are not
> deterministic we could simply through them away.

  For now will stick to the run check family. Thanks.

Thanks, Anand

> Thanks,
> Eryu
> 
>> +run_check mount -o rw,remount $dev_1 $SCRATCH_MNT
>> +run_check $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device delete $dev_2 $SCRATCH_MNT
>> +run_check $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device ready $dev_1
>> +
>> +_scratch_unmount
>> +_scratch_dev_pool_put
>> +
>> +echo "Silence is golden"
>> +
>> +# success, all done
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/168.out b/tests/btrfs/168.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..893a41d859c8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/168.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +QA output created by 168
>> +Silence is golden
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
>> index 5cff3bd6cc03..7bc3ea457992 100644
>> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
>> @@ -170,3 +170,4 @@
>>   165 auto quick subvol
>>   166 auto quick qgroup
>>   167 auto quick replace volume
>> +168 auto quick volume
>> -- 
>> 2.15.0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03  8:47 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/168 verify device ready after device delete Anand Jain
2018-07-06  4:40 ` Eryu Guan
2018-07-06  6:01   ` Anand Jain [this message]
2018-07-06  6:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Anand Jain
2018-07-17  5:19   ` Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d563fc6b-faef-aed9-2c63-6b7c07f3c09d@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox