From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: Introduce check for explicit SHARED extent flag reporting
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:10:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee69e021-916f-3f8e-aef1-7321d47ca70c@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161118055435.GB26329@birch.djwong.org>
On 11/18/2016 01:54 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:06:48AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> For fs support reflink, some of them (OK, btrfs again) doesn't split
>> SHARED flag for extent fiemap reporting.
>>
>> For example:
>> 0 4K 8K
>> / File1: Extent 0 \
>> / \
>> |<- On disk Extent-->|
>> | /
>> | File2 /
>> Extent: 0
>>
>> Fs supports explicit SHARED extent reporting should report fiemap like:
>> File1: 2 extents
>> Extent 0-4K: SHARED
>> Extent 4-8K:
>> File2: 1 extents
>> Extent 0-4K: SHARED
>>
>> Fs doesn't support explicit reporting will report fiemap like:
>> File1: 1 extent
>> Extent 0-8K: SHARED
>> File2: 1 extent
>> Extent 0-4K: SHARED
>
> How difficult /would/ it be to fix btrfs, anyway?
Not sure.
Since the file extent backref is not well designed in btrfs, we must
check the fs tree to determine the correct file offset before splitting
the fiemap result.
And it may cause extra performance problem.
So I would like to make it as it for now.
Anyway, even btrfs can report correct result, while punching hole at
range without SHARED flag, it won't free any space...
So the current behavior has its meaning.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> --D
>
>>
>> Test case like generic/372 require explicit reporting will cause false
>> alert on btrfs.
>>
>> Add such runtime check for that requirememt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> common/reflink | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/generic/372 | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/reflink b/common/reflink
>> index 8b34046..9ada2e8 100644
>> --- a/common/reflink
>> +++ b/common/reflink
>> @@ -78,6 +78,50 @@ _require_scratch_reflink()
>> _scratch_unmount
>> }
>>
>> +# this test requires scratch fs to report explicit SHARED flag
>> +# e.g.
>> +# 0 4K 8K
>> +# / File1: Extent 0 \
>> +# / \
>> +# |<- On disk Extent-->|
>> +# | /
>> +# | File2 /
>> +# Extent: 0
>> +# Fs supports explicit SHARED extent reporting should report fiemap like:
>> +# File1: 2 extents
>> +# Extent 0-4K: SHARED
>> +# Extent 4-8K:
>> +# File2: 1 extents
>> +# Extent 0-4K: SHARED
>> +#
>> +# Fs doesn't support explicit reporting will report fiemap like:
>> +# File1: 1 extent
>> +# Extent 0-8K: SHARED
>> +# File2: 1 extent
>> +# Extent 0-4K: SHARED
>> +_require_scratch_explicit_shared_extents()
>> +{
>> + _require_scratch
>> + _require_fiemap
>> + _require_scratch_reflink
>> + _require_xfs_io_command "reflink"
>> + local nr_extents
>> +
>> + _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null
>> + _scratch_mount
>> +
>> + _pwrite_byte 0x61 0 128k $SCRATCH_MNT/file1
>> + _reflink_range $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 0 64k
>> +
>> + _scratch_cycle_mount
>> +
>> + nr_extents=$(_count_extents $SCRATCH_MNT/file1)
>> + if [ $nr_extents -eq 1 ]; then
>> + _notrun "Explicit SHARED flag reporting not support by filesystem type: $FSTYP"
>> + fi
>> + _scratch_unmount
>> +}
>> +
>> # this test requires the test fs support dedupe...
>> _require_test_dedupe()
>> {
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/372 b/tests/generic/372
>> index 31dff20..51a3eca 100755
>> --- a/tests/generic/372
>> +++ b/tests/generic/372
>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ _supported_os Linux
>> _supported_fs generic
>> _require_scratch_reflink
>> _require_fiemap
>> +_require_scratch_explicit_shared_extents
>>
>> echo "Format and mount"
>> _scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-18 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-17 2:06 [PATCH] fstests: Introduce check for explicit SHARED extent flag reporting Qu Wenruo
2016-11-18 5:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-11-18 6:10 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2016-11-18 7:21 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee69e021-916f-3f8e-aef1-7321d47ca70c@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox