From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BF4C433EF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 15:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1378345AbiDDPnQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:43:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54956 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1378683AbiDDPnD (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:43:03 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 303 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:41:06 PDT Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3BC393F5 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 08:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.146] (liberator.sandeen.net [10.0.0.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sandeen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E68B62AEE; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:34:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:36:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Eryu Guan , fstests@vger.kernel.org References: <20220321161935.46g3n22wbv5bfnyq@zlang-mailbox> From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: maintainership of fstests In-Reply-To: <20220321161935.46g3n22wbv5bfnyq@zlang-mailbox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org On 3/21/22 11:19 AM, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:38:23AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> It's almost 6 years since I've taken the maintainership of fstests, and >> I tried my best to keep the pace of weekly update, or at least bi-weekly >> update due to something like public holidays. >> >> But it's been a month since last fstests update due to my personal >> urgent issues, and some patches got no review for more than one month. >> So I think it's time to re-consider the maintainership of fstests. >> >> I will have less spare time in the foreseeable future, as I have to >> spend more time on my family, so it's hard to keep the weekly update >> pace. And six years is a long time, I think it's time to have a new >> maintainer. > > Hi Eryu, > > By thinking about it a while, I get up my courage to apply this job, although I > know I'm not the best one can handle this job. Just this project is really > useful for my team. Nearly from I joined Red Hat, my jobs started to around the > xfstests. It's a great testsuit, which can cover most of our testing. I felt > relieved when you toke this maintainer, and admired your courage at that time, > that really helps us a lot. No matter what you decide, thanks again for all your > help, as previous colleague, as friend. Hi Zorro - I'm sure that you would do well as a new maintainer, even if it requires some learning. Every new challenge requires learning. :) If you are able to balance it with your other tasks, I would be happy to see you take this on, if it's something you want to do. (See also Darrick's suggestion that maintainer tasks could be split up a bit, across the different filesystems.) Thanks, -Eric > Thanks, > Zorro > >> >> Or we could go to the group-maintain way? As Darrick mentioned before >> (for xfs not fstests, if I recall correctly). Then we need a new primary >> maintainer :) >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thanks, >> Eryu >> >> P.S. >> I'll keep the maintainer role and do the review & update as usual until >> all things settle down. >> >