From: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org,
fdmanana@kernel.org, quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] btrfs/301: Make the test compatible with all the supported block sizes
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 19:49:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcc241b7-2323-4375-9ce2-40eada4966f8@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83e91ed9d2b55bdf6e63f9607267d36e31548f07.1755677274.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
On 20/08/25 1:45 pm, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> With large block sizes like 64k the test failed with the
> following logs:
>
> QA output created by 301
> basic accounting
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 33947648 vs 4587520 (expected data 4194304 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 168165376 vs 138805248 (expected data 138412032 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 33947648 vs 4587520 (expected data 4194304 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> +subvol 256 mismatched usage 33947648 vs 4587520 (expected data 4194304 expected meta 393216 diff 29360128)
> fallocate: Disk quota exceeded
>
> The test creates nr_fill files each of size 8k. Now with 64k
> block size, 8k sized files occupy more than the expected sizes (i.e, 8k)
> due to internal fragmentation, since 1 file will occupy at least 1
> fsblock. Fix this by making the file size 64k, which is aligned
> with all the supported block sizes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
I tested it on Power, and the btrfs/301 test passes with both 4k & 64k
block sizes.
SECTION -- btrfs_64k
RECREATING -- btrfs on /dev/loop0
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/ppc64le localhost 6.17.0-rc2-00060-g068a56e56fa8
#3 SMP Thu Aug 21 17:54:04 IST 2025
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -s 65536 -n 65536 /dev/loop1
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop1 /mnt/scratch
btrfs/301 67s ... 111s
Ran: btrfs/301
Passed all 1 tests
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/301 | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/301 b/tests/btrfs/301
> index 6b59749d..be346f52 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/301
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/301
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ subv=$SCRATCH_MNT/subv
> nested=$SCRATCH_MNT/subv/nested
> snap=$SCRATCH_MNT/snap
> nr_fill=512
> -fill_sz=$((8 * 1024))
> +fill_sz=$((64 * 1024))
> total_fill=$(($nr_fill * $fill_sz))
> nodesize=$($BTRFS_UTIL_PROG inspect-internal dump-super $SCRATCH_DEV | \
> grep nodesize | $AWK_PROG '{print $2}')
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 8:15 [PATCH v3 0/4] btrfs: Misc test fixes for large block/node sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] btrfs/301: Make the test compatible with all the supported block sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-22 14:19 ` Disha Goel [this message]
2025-08-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] generic/274: Make the pwrite block sizes and offsets to 64k Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-22 14:25 ` Disha Goel
2025-08-25 4:34 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-25 4:44 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-08-25 6:07 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] btrfs/137: Make this test compatible with all supported block sizes Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-22 14:27 ` Disha Goel
2025-08-20 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] generic/563: Increase the iosize to to cover for btrfs Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-22 14:37 ` Disha Goel
2025-08-25 6:08 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-25 5:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] btrfs: Misc test fixes for large block/node sizes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-25 6:08 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcc241b7-2323-4375-9ce2-40eada4966f8@linux.ibm.com \
--to=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox