From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 278031B809; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720635259; cv=none; b=XMckIJYFPYdK+UpIwoz6MiEpNH+4dd2aVQidMAZVCS4PsOgW2PCpK7q0XZeyKIACBwOIWhSxr4ILlqF89EL1mpXfltWYbx1MdPjL8X2Ji4L9gea+mbFsGXfMMYTCx8R2/pBFBW7KhHAa2oQdlBJAlFav7Esm1VnrcnmP6HSymkw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720635259; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PqIZtFDhIR4aNKnB7bdK7qEmMFV28vA12grouRhrCnc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ttOh6mH1aGsWIrXWcaq+lQIgSzU6lLyXDHcNdFW0uR8CUKR4hDFItlzn6ypN54ssV7RaVf1m2l8D3LXp6demnusU5h44IwgUvB0TNBuxU1Nakb3JACjn3xoY4KJqMSzlqA+34avCSRE3GTs1VbZsPhW6b/QG7P/K+iIHaNwP4pU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pXtalsw5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pXtalsw5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F361C32781; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:14:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720635258; bh=PqIZtFDhIR4aNKnB7bdK7qEmMFV28vA12grouRhrCnc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pXtalsw5iz8YAtDSUtRUcz4U6SUkkNsO4Hf5KtdpaeGDbwgs+RyjdqS6FoxUmsB0K cMvP+ctndr/FXvGNX9oGmuY6nJ6bVrTQ8WnTipRBPmhtvXWxdfNGKkPkNpnC1PBLPX nwmq3tbWxkN+n1ls9p6daaNXmZsaiFo/Z5A6HsmY0doaX9q2Es6eBSM1P0R8jLO9mp WFW+9v/mXfPqnyc5YFPhD2x8rQzr7zdnfZ7jTjTnKiZ8SUy+2UQjcUccLQdG9prqGG kDefCRJns6BEqbA062CRlvdXw0YiQCqPDQKXg3NDDiVTWWKdZ+Rm84+j2XLkcN89YY VDhcHs72ML4/w== Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:14:17 +0000 From: Eric Biggers To: Mikulas Patocka Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Sami Tolvanen , Bart Van Assche , Herbert Xu , Mike Snitzer , Jonathan Brassow Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] Optimize dm-verity and fsverity using multibuffer hashing Message-ID: <20240710181417.GA58377@google.com> References: <20240611034822.36603-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <7097bafd-e146-99a5-7f86-369e8e2b080@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fsverity@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7097bafd-e146-99a5-7f86-369e8e2b080@redhat.com> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:54:24PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to ask what's the status of this patchset. > > Will Herbert accept it? What's the planned kernel version where it will > appear? > > Mikulas It's blocked by Herbert wanting to design the multibuffer hashing API in a more complex way that doesn't make sense. See the previous discussions. I don't know when Herbert will change his mind, so for now I've shifted my focus to the Android kernels. (In the mean time, the improvements that don't depend on the actual multibuffer hashing API still make sense to apply upstream, though.) - Eric