From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBA821A421; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739814034; cv=none; b=gL4KI6eUclRn/g9+M9k87/I2g9tur3lrVPQ30zd+7ikED2Qpj8vKeID9T3TtiTM/ZAryaQ4YH6FM4TFQehMaw3do1KNwv53feZ1JWz26doNc+kerPkMAYKfILrTACucHkXQuSaVRblpBcA8Y+IAofylUWEwAwEdazgMvxfd25LE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739814034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Dy/0GI1ft/U44yuy4Q2Na9V/ddLvYKKyiIq0KGW5S+c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f82uCrWp5lFK0a9jz/UaUyuRRQ9PbrtW43dUNq15WlX/dHShmdAwnM76CzxMrb+mPdCIlkX2y9w+KaLaVePqq1HcKCVRhIdr3FE9zPiWxI4bCoWGI9UehgVlNihEEp4fxUmAKnd4meavwQ4S3ocnSm7BuP2vxYARaZcyLM+p7Es= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WNhfr3gv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WNhfr3gv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31ECAC4CED1; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:40:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739814033; bh=Dy/0GI1ft/U44yuy4Q2Na9V/ddLvYKKyiIq0KGW5S+c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WNhfr3gvbgG7kEediEzqfjJ61dCny56DanKCmNYmeojo/ibXqv4tJuMGMZ+0jGf0J wIhL0GJ+DU21zwz6EzFpJmP9FuZosVt4FztCzQ4rdkupYgOuCc6rXFrIcxyn6RYf49 i+kWLBaZYC2gEc5toYkq/WxuDabqk2BGBotwlrn7MTMX3JwV3pSoYhPF0xDuNQR9jy 0S1NHGCu3f6hB2wm9kg7OQZ7Wm68Ix6eQ97fFfwtB4O/zCqcmAKWHLo5iZ2NNDQagc 55814Y2qdrlL0XnmVoIWz0+cdSuQXmAznp1zvJAolcTdxfUYCatEYdwBBPcmn+jh4q P75nMbAfJef3w== Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:40:32 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Herbert Xu Cc: Eric Biggers , fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Sami Tolvanen , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Linus Torvalds , Mikulas Patocka , David Howells , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Optimize dm-verity and fsverity using multibuffer hashing Message-ID: <20250217094032.3cbe64c7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250212154718.44255-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250213063304.GA11664@sol.localdomain> <20250215090412.46937c11@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fsverity@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:27:02 +0800 Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 09:04:12AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Can confirm, FWIW. I don't know as much about IPsec, but for TLS > > lightweight SW-only crypto would be ideal. > > Please note that while CPU-only crypto is the best for networking, > it actually operates in asynchronous mode on x86. This is because > RX occurs in softirq context, which may not be able to use SIMD on > x86. Yes, that's true for tunnels and for IPsec. TLS does crypto in sendmsg/recvmsg, process context.