FILESYSTEM IN USERSPACE (FUSE) development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu, bernd@bsbernd.com
Cc: fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] fuse: publish io-uring queues with release semantics
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 10:43:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715174305.336261-4-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715174305.336261-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>

fuse_uring_create_queue() initializes a fuse_ring_queue and then
publishes the pointer into ring->queues[qid] with WRITE_ONCE() under the
fch->lock. There are several readers that may concurrently be fetching
that pointer locklessly and then deferencing it.

WRITE_ONCE() doesn't ensure ordering of the queue's field
initialization before the ring->queues[qid] pointer assignment. The
queue must be published with smp_store_release() so the field
initialization is guaranteed to happen before.

Readers in paths where the read may happen concurrently with the store
need to use READ_ONCE() because any race involving a plain access is
undefined.

Fixes: 24fe962c86f5 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
---
 fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
index 51f985154aa1..bf9d51f2a508 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
@@ -321,9 +321,11 @@ static struct fuse_ring_queue *fuse_uring_create_queue(struct fuse_ring *ring,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * write_once and lock as the caller mostly doesn't take the lock at all
+	 * fch->lock serializes concurrent creators for this qid.
+	 * smp_store_release() are for the lockless readers who must see a
+	 * fully initialized queue after &ring->queues[qid] is set
 	 */
-	WRITE_ONCE(ring->queues[qid], queue);
+	smp_store_release(&ring->queues[qid], queue);
 	spin_unlock(&fch->lock);
 
 	return queue;
@@ -434,7 +436,7 @@ static void fuse_uring_log_ent_state(struct fuse_ring *ring)
 	struct fuse_ring_ent *ent;
 
 	for (qid = 0; qid < ring->nr_queues; qid++) {
-		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ring->queues[qid];
+		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
 
 		if (!queue)
 			continue;
@@ -967,7 +969,7 @@ static int fuse_uring_commit_fetch(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, int issue_flags,
 	if (qid >= ring->nr_queues)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	queue = ring->queues[qid];
+	queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
 	if (!queue)
 		return err;
 	fpq = &queue->fpq;
@@ -1035,7 +1037,7 @@ static bool is_ring_ready(struct fuse_ring *ring, int current_qid)
 		if (current_qid == qid)
 			continue;
 
-		queue = ring->queues[qid];
+		queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
 		if (!queue) {
 			ready = false;
 			break;
@@ -1191,7 +1193,7 @@ static int fuse_uring_register(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	queue = ring->queues[qid];
+	queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
 	if (!queue) {
 		queue = fuse_uring_create_queue(ring, qid);
 		if (!queue)
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-15 17:43 [PATCH v2 0/3] fuse: fix missing barriers in io-uring init Joanne Koong
2026-07-15 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] fuse: fix missing barrier when checking io-uring readiness Joanne Koong
2026-07-15 22:26   ` Bernd Schubert
2026-07-16 18:17     ` Joanne Koong
2026-07-15 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] fuse: use release/acquire for fch->initialized Joanne Koong
2026-07-15 17:43 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2026-07-15 22:54   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] fuse: publish io-uring queues with release semantics Bernd Schubert
2026-07-16 18:21     ` Joanne Koong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260715174305.336261-4-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox