From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
To: bernd@bsbernd.com
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev, Thomas <thomas.fractalbits@gmail.com>,
zhu <zzsheng@gmail.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: Fix the condition to enable over-io-uring
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:59:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba933500-eab4-4ee5-b276-2e155cd992ba@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821-fuse-fix-enable-condition-v2-1-35a386d3d443@bsbernd.com>
Hi Bernd,
On 2026/8/22 00:19, Bernd Schubert via B4 Relay wrote:
> + /* Once a connection has io-uring enabled on it, it can't be disabled */
> + if (!enable_uring && !fch->io_uring) {
> + pr_info_ratelimited("fuse-io-uring is disabled by module parameter\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + if (!fch->io_uring) {
> + pr_info_ratelimited(
> + "fuse-io-uring not enabled on this connection\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
This combined with the REGISTER error path can hang IO when the ring is
already operational. E.g. 100 entries, the 100th REGISTER fails after
ring->ready is set:
new request: server fetch:
fuse_send_one() IORING_OP_URING_CMD
fiq->ops->send_req() fuse_uring_cmd()
fuse_uring_queue_fuse_req() if (!fch->io_uring) // == 0
-> queued, no consumer return -EOPNOTSUPP
The error path clears fch->io_uring but never reverts fiq->ops, so
requests keep flowing into io_uring queues while COMMIT_AND_FETCH is
rejected for all 99 active entries.
Maybe only tear down if the ring never became ready:
if (err) {
if (!fuse_uring_ready(fch)) {
fch->io_uring = 0;
wake_up_all(&fch->blocked_waitq);
pr_info("[%u] fuse-io-uring disabled on connection err=%d\n",
fch->conn->dev, err);
}
return err;
}
Regards,
Baokun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 16:19 [PATCH v2] fuse: Fix the condition to enable over-io-uring Bernd Schubert via B4 Relay
2026-08-24 7:59 ` Baokun Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba933500-eab4-4ee5-b276-2e155cd992ba@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.fractalbits@gmail.com \
--cc=zzsheng@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox