FILESYSTEM IN USERSPACE (FUSE) development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
To: bernd@bsbernd.com
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
	fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev, Thomas <thomas.fractalbits@gmail.com>,
	zhu <zzsheng@gmail.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: Fix the condition to enable over-io-uring
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:59:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba933500-eab4-4ee5-b276-2e155cd992ba@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821-fuse-fix-enable-condition-v2-1-35a386d3d443@bsbernd.com>

Hi Bernd,

On 2026/8/22 00:19, Bernd Schubert via B4 Relay wrote:
> + /* Once a connection has io-uring enabled on it, it can't be disabled */
> + if (!enable_uring && !fch->io_uring) {
> + pr_info_ratelimited("fuse-io-uring is disabled by module parameter\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + if (!fch->io_uring) {
> + pr_info_ratelimited(
> + "fuse-io-uring not enabled on this connection\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }

This combined with the REGISTER error path can hang IO when the ring is
already operational.  E.g. 100 entries, the 100th REGISTER fails after
ring->ready is set:

  new request:                        server fetch:
  fuse_send_one()                     IORING_OP_URING_CMD
    fiq->ops->send_req()                fuse_uring_cmd()
      fuse_uring_queue_fuse_req()         if (!fch->io_uring)  // == 0
        -> queued, no consumer              return -EOPNOTSUPP

The error path clears fch->io_uring but never reverts fiq->ops, so
requests keep flowing into io_uring queues while COMMIT_AND_FETCH is
rejected for all 99 active entries.

Maybe only tear down if the ring never became ready:

      if (err) {
          if (!fuse_uring_ready(fch)) {
              fch->io_uring = 0;
              wake_up_all(&fch->blocked_waitq);
              pr_info("[%u] fuse-io-uring disabled on connection err=%d\n",
                      fch->conn->dev, err);
          }
          return err;
      }


Regards,
Baokun



      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 16:19 [PATCH v2] fuse: Fix the condition to enable over-io-uring Bernd Schubert via B4 Relay
2026-08-24  7:59 ` Baokun Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba933500-eab4-4ee5-b276-2e155cd992ba@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.fractalbits@gmail.com \
    --cc=zzsheng@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox