public inbox for gfs2@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: teigland@redhat.com
Cc: gfs2@lists.linux.dev, aahringo@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH dlm/next 2/2] dlm: put lkbs instead of force free
Date: Wed,  3 Jan 2024 21:05:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104020558.2594636-3-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104020558.2594636-1-aahringo@redhat.com>

This patch converts a force free of the lkb idr and switch to use the
lkbs put functionality. If there are still references hold due the lkb
programming logic and its state it will be drop before. Instead of force
freeing the lkbs of the idr using the refcounters makes sure we using
the reference counters correctly. If we do that, then no rsb should be
left on the lockspace keep hash bucket which is an additonally check
added to this patch. All rsbs on the toss list should have a reference
counter of 1.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/lock.c      |  2 +-
 fs/dlm/lock.h      |  1 +
 fs/dlm/lockspace.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index c30e9f8d017e..f77f479e53b6 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ static void add_lkb(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int status)
 	}
 }
 
-static void del_lkb(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
+void del_lkb(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
 {
 	lkb->lkb_status = 0;
 	list_del(&lkb->lkb_statequeue);
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.h b/fs/dlm/lock.h
index b54e2cbbe6e2..853c3d3dc49d 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ int dlm_debug_add_lkb(struct dlm_ls *ls, uint32_t lkb_id, char *name, int len,
 		      int lkb_nodeid, unsigned int lkb_flags, int lkb_status);
 int dlm_debug_add_lkb_to_waiters(struct dlm_ls *ls, uint32_t lkb_id,
 				 int mstype, int to_nodeid);
+void del_lkb(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb);
 
 static inline int is_master(struct dlm_rsb *r)
 {
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c
index 0455dddb0797..c7ab7358422b 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c
@@ -737,14 +737,28 @@ static int lkb_idr_is_any(int id, void *p, void *data)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int lkb_idr_free(int id, void *p, void *data)
+/*
+ * No locking required, lockspace usage should be synchronized
+ * to have any activity anymore.
+ */
+static int lkb_idr_put(int id, void *p, void *data)
 {
 	struct dlm_lkb *lkb = p;
 
-	if (lkb->lkb_lvbptr && test_bit(DLM_IFL_MSTCPY_BIT, &lkb->lkb_iflags))
-		dlm_free_lvb(lkb->lkb_lvbptr);
+	if (lkb->lkb_status)
+		del_lkb(lkb->lkb_resource, lkb);
 
-	dlm_free_lkb(lkb);
+	/* drop all wait_count references we still
+	 * hold a reference for this iteration.
+	 */
+	while (atomic_read(&lkb->lkb_wait_count)) {
+		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lkb->lkb_wait_count))
+			list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_wait_reply);
+
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(dlm_put_lkb(lkb));
+	}
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!dlm_put_lkb(lkb));
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -826,7 +840,7 @@ static int release_lockspace(struct dlm_ls *ls, int force)
 	 * Free all lkb's in idr
 	 */
 
-	idr_for_each(&ls->ls_lkbidr, lkb_idr_free, ls);
+	idr_for_each(&ls->ls_lkbidr, lkb_idr_put, ls);
 	idr_destroy(&ls->ls_lkbidr);
 
 	/*
@@ -834,15 +848,12 @@ static int release_lockspace(struct dlm_ls *ls, int force)
 	 */
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ls->ls_rsbtbl_size; i++) {
-		while ((n = rb_first(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].keep))) {
-			rsb = rb_entry(n, struct dlm_rsb, res_hashnode);
-			rb_erase(n, &ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].keep);
-			dlm_free_rsb(rsb);
-		}
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].keep));
 
 		while ((n = rb_first(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].toss))) {
 			rsb = rb_entry(n, struct dlm_rsb, res_hashnode);
 			rb_erase(n, &ls->ls_rsbtbl[i].toss);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(kref_read(&rsb->res_ref) != 1);
 			dlm_free_rsb(rsb);
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.39.3


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-04  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-04  2:05 [PATCH dlm/next 0/2] dlm: refcount fixes and improvements Alexander Aring
2024-01-04  2:05 ` [PATCH dlm/next 1/2] dlm: fix off-by-one waiters refcount handling Alexander Aring
2024-01-04  2:05 ` Alexander Aring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240104020558.2594636-3-aahringo@redhat.com \
    --to=aahringo@redhat.com \
    --cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=teigland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox