From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: teigland@redhat.com
Cc: gfs2@lists.linux.dev, aahringo@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v6.10-rc1 07/11] dlm: using rcu to avoid rsb lookup again
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 17:12:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240528211241.2140441-7-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528211241.2140441-1-aahringo@redhat.com>
This patch converts the rsb to be protected under rcu. When the rcu lock
is held it cannot be freed. In combination with the new introduced flag
RSB_HASHED we can check if the rsb is still part of the ls_rsbtbl
hashtable, it cannot be part of another table. If its still part of the
ls_rsbtbl we can avoid a second dlm_search_rsb_tree() call.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h | 2 ++
fs/dlm/lock.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/dlm/memory.c | 9 +++++-
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
index 61dc58bdd006..5acdc6c2b4b8 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ struct dlm_rsb {
struct list_head res_recover_list; /* used for recovery */
struct list_head res_toss_q_list;
int res_recover_locks_count;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
char *res_lvbptr;
char res_name[DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN+1];
@@ -366,6 +367,7 @@ enum rsb_flags {
RSB_RECOVER_GRANT,
RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL,
RSB_TOSS,
+ RSB_HASHED,
};
static inline void rsb_set_flag(struct dlm_rsb *r, enum rsb_flags flag)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 818e4b282b14..69a25ec82d1e 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ void dlm_rsb_toss_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
list_del(&r->res_rsbs_list);
rhashtable_remove_fast(&ls->ls_rsbtbl, &r->res_node,
dlm_rhash_rsb_params);
+ rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_HASHED);
/* not necessary to held the ls_rsbtbl_lock when
* calling send_remove()
@@ -658,8 +659,14 @@ int dlm_search_rsb_tree(struct rhashtable *rhash, const void *name, int len,
static int rsb_insert(struct dlm_rsb *rsb, struct rhashtable *rhash)
{
- return rhashtable_insert_fast(rhash, &rsb->res_node,
- dlm_rhash_rsb_params);
+ int rv;
+
+ rv = rhashtable_insert_fast(rhash, &rsb->res_node,
+ dlm_rhash_rsb_params);
+ if (!rv)
+ rsb_set_flag(rsb, RSB_HASHED);
+
+ return rv;
}
/*
@@ -773,12 +780,11 @@ static int find_rsb_dir(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
do_toss:
write_lock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
-
- /* retry lookup under write lock to see if its still in toss state
- * if not it's in keep state and we relookup - unlikely path.
+ /* retry lookup under write lock to see if its still hashed and in
+ * toss state if not it's in keep state and we relookup - unlikely
+ * path.
*/
- error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl, name, len, &r);
- if (!error) {
+ if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_HASHED)) {
if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_TOSS)) {
write_unlock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
goto retry;
@@ -949,12 +955,11 @@ static int find_rsb_nodir(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
do_toss:
write_lock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
-
- /* retry lookup under write lock to see if its still in toss state
- * if not it's in keep state and we relookup - unlikely path.
+ /* retry lookup under write lock to see if its still hashed and in
+ * toss state if not it's in keep state and we relookup - unlikely
+ * path.
*/
- error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl, name, len, &r);
- if (!error) {
+ if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_HASHED)) {
if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_TOSS)) {
write_unlock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
goto retry;
@@ -1046,6 +1051,7 @@ static int find_rsb(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
{
int dir_nodeid;
uint32_t hash;
+ int rv;
if (len > DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1053,12 +1059,20 @@ static int find_rsb(struct dlm_ls *ls, const void *name, int len,
hash = jhash(name, len, 0);
dir_nodeid = dlm_hash2nodeid(ls, hash);
+ /* hold the rcu lock here to prevent freeing of the rsb
+ * while looking it up, there are currently a optimization
+ * to not lookup the rsb twice instead look if its still
+ * part of the rsbtbl hash.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (dlm_no_directory(ls))
- return find_rsb_nodir(ls, name, len, hash, dir_nodeid,
- from_nodeid, flags, r_ret);
- else
- return find_rsb_dir(ls, name, len, hash, dir_nodeid,
+ rv = find_rsb_nodir(ls, name, len, hash, dir_nodeid,
from_nodeid, flags, r_ret);
+ else
+ rv = find_rsb_dir(ls, name, len, hash, dir_nodeid,
+ from_nodeid, flags, r_ret);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return rv;
}
/* we have received a request and found that res_master_nodeid != our_nodeid,
@@ -1244,6 +1258,12 @@ int dlm_master_lookup(struct dlm_ls *ls, int from_nodeid, const char *name,
retry:
+ /* the rcu lock here is combined to RSB_HASHED that the rsb did not
+ * got freed during the read to write ls_rsbtbl_lock lock state change.
+ * We can then simply check if the rsb is still hashed instead of doing
+ * a lookup again.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
/* check if the rsb is in keep state under read lock - likely path */
read_lock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl, name, len, &r);
@@ -1267,10 +1287,12 @@ int dlm_master_lookup(struct dlm_ls *ls, int from_nodeid, const char *name,
/* the rsb was active */
unlock_rsb(r);
put_rsb(r);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
} else {
read_unlock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
goto not_found;
}
@@ -1279,19 +1301,22 @@ int dlm_master_lookup(struct dlm_ls *ls, int from_nodeid, const char *name,
write_lock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
/* rsb_mod_timer() requires to held ls_rsbtbl_lock in write lock
- * check if the rsb is still in toss state, if not relookup
+ * check if the rsb is still hashed and in toss state, if not relookup
*/
- error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl, name, len, &r);
- if (!error) {
+ if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_HASHED)) {
if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_TOSS)) {
write_unlock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
/* something as changed, very unlikely but
* try again
*/
+ rcu_read_unlock();
goto retry;
}
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
} else {
write_unlock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
goto not_found;
}
@@ -4306,6 +4331,7 @@ static void receive_remove(struct dlm_ls *ls, const struct dlm_message *ms)
list_del(&r->res_rsbs_list);
rhashtable_remove_fast(&ls->ls_rsbtbl, &r->res_node,
dlm_rhash_rsb_params);
+ rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_HASHED);
write_unlock_bh(&ls->ls_rsbtbl_lock);
free_toss_rsb(r);
diff --git a/fs/dlm/memory.c b/fs/dlm/memory.c
index 15a8b1cee433..a7b994517bd8 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/memory.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/memory.c
@@ -101,13 +101,20 @@ struct dlm_rsb *dlm_allocate_rsb(struct dlm_ls *ls)
return r;
}
-void dlm_free_rsb(struct dlm_rsb *r)
+static void __dlm_free_rsb(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
+ struct dlm_rsb *r = container_of(rcu, struct dlm_rsb, rcu);
+
if (r->res_lvbptr)
dlm_free_lvb(r->res_lvbptr);
kmem_cache_free(rsb_cache, r);
}
+void dlm_free_rsb(struct dlm_rsb *r)
+{
+ call_rcu(&r->rcu, __dlm_free_rsb);
+}
+
struct dlm_lkb *dlm_allocate_lkb(struct dlm_ls *ls)
{
struct dlm_lkb *lkb;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 21:12 [PATCH v6.10-rc1 01/11] dlm: remove scand leftovers Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 02/11] dlm: don't kref_init rsbs created for toss list Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 03/11] dlm: remove unused parameter in dlm_midcomms_addr Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 04/11] dlm: remove ls_local_handle from struct dlm_ls Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 05/11] dlm: rename dlm_find_lockspace_local to dlm_get_lockspace Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 06/11] dlm: drop own rsb pre allocation mechanism Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 08/11] dlm: move lkb idr to xarray datastructure Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 09/11] dlm: move recover " Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 10/11] dlm: merge nodeid field to master_nodeid Alexander Aring
2024-05-28 21:12 ` [PATCH v6.10-rc1 11/11] dlm: use is_master() where it's prossible Alexander Aring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240528211241.2140441-7-aahringo@redhat.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox