From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: teigland@redhat.com
Cc: aahringo@redhat.com, gfs2@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH dlm] dlm: fix add msg handle in send_queue ordered
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:54:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417215411.1665232-1-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In a benchmark scenario triggering a lot of requests that triggers a lot
of DLM messages on the network it can be that the mh->seq is not ordered
according the oldest seq number. This ordering is required by
dlm_receive_ack as "before(mh->seq, seq)" will stop to check for older
sequence numbers that are ordered in the tail of "node->send_queue".
The side effects of not having it correct ordered regarding
"before(mh->seq, seq)" are refcounting issues and use-after free.
I only was able to reproduce this issue in a experimental DLM branch
and a user space DLM benchmark that uses io_uring. After changing this I
don't experienced any refcounting with the sending buffer issues anymore.
Fixes: 489d8e559c659 ("fs: dlm: add reliable connection if reconnect")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/midcomms.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
index a5b363b4785f3..6b522d4e2b7e3 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
@@ -969,10 +969,10 @@ static void midcomms_new_msg_cb(void *data)
atomic_inc(&mh->node->send_queue_cnt);
spin_lock_bh(&mh->node->send_queue_lock);
+ /* need to be locked with list_add_tail_rcu() because list is ordered */
+ mh->seq = atomic_fetch_inc(&mh->node->seq_send);
list_add_tail_rcu(&mh->list, &mh->node->send_queue);
spin_unlock_bh(&mh->node->send_queue_lock);
-
- mh->seq = atomic_fetch_inc(&mh->node->seq_send);
}
static struct dlm_msg *dlm_midcomms_get_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh, int nodeid,
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260417215411.1665232-1-aahringo@redhat.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox