From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D748B17561; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710149273; cv=none; b=jhvULMN1/B+QdkN8YHyHX+zsVQ+LVaV9aFVExroKh2uDNDtsJQOBy6Wbn1brcsFY6ESvNAWktY06ey1pfIAYiKphOYLuoVuKdH0YbGcLmvcXcAKMAp81CAZaUs/100fC78HuJD1unVnkVVKvoRF9Cn5xSZYLUnYXivDGgeJaQgw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710149273; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zo50emVo+yAS+xyCxhzK/JticZSFs9rq9yU7KC6O2DU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=gM+S1QEjn4ZreRwX01FZxOZ/EDE0WGFgcxDM7yznYuHIkzJT/OKj8IZd6jH90o2P3QW8R44+TBda+DN5iH1AB370KH6o269dbOtQPahmWTbu8jF+M6SAvMwj1zJhRD0lF2/91yWv7IwxC+mMLh3ri5BMrfiZ9nn3O1FOOam8AdU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=breSe7D+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.132 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="breSe7D+" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1710149267; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=l2AbEBfS717sEFsVW37uRE+Hz8tZTWhFDavtXMq++CQ=; b=breSe7D+dh8NZJlnC9+B6Eu6m+Pd6IOItQ1LJhTX50gZo9xHqfTaTHy9EybvqnFlhK+m1hcR+GYkKiaJ2U+AA57SxUmNolyzbLrqb0150AYZNzg4skXgcmUfN2EDOr8SFZwcYCYbH6RUUVDhssizu1TPJvmB3LLRFQXsphjxdAs= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R801e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046049;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W2EpOdM_1710149266; Received: from 30.221.129.84(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W2EpOdM_1710149266) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:27:46 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:27:46 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: gfs2@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: ocfs2 mount error Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Valentin_Vidi=C4=87?= Cc: Alexander Aring , David Teigland , gfs2@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, Heming Zhao References: <49396145-712d-44eb-884e-58eb19b1f4f2@linux.alibaba.com> From: Joseph Qi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 3/11/24 5:02 PM, Valentin Vidić wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:37:39PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: >> It seems that you are using fsdlm. >> But from your running commands, I don't see how fsdlm get involved. >> Could you please give more detail on how to reproduce it? > > Sure, this is the original Pacemaker test script that failed: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ha-team/ocfs2-tools/-/blob/master/debian/tests/pcmk?ref_type=heads > > Basically it starts Corosync and DLM services and than calls: > > mkfs.ocfs2 > fsck.ocfs2 > mount.ocfs2 > Thanks for quick reply. Now it confirms that it is using fsdlm. Joseph