From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Cc: teigland@redhat.com, ccaulfie@redhat.com, jfriesse@redhat.com,
nicholas.yang@suse.com, glass.su@suse.com, gfs2@lists.linux.dev,
Roger Zhou <ZZhou@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dlm_controld: support corosync3/knet multi-link
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:59:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efad042e-6035-4045-b4e8-7798055945a1@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK-6q+gbGg9rQKuKkpLyURN_nY1N+k87YPj1e8HqL_zTy0GgUw@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/7/25 02:11, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi Heming,
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 3:42 AM Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> The totem.rrp_mode config item was obsolete in corosync3. And
>> this patch gives dlm_controld the ability to detect multiple
>> links.
>>
>> The corosync and dlm network protocol relationship table:
>>
>> -------------+-----------------------+---------------------
>> | totem.transport=udpu | totem.transport=udp
>> +-----------------------+---------------------
>> corosync 2.x | | | multicast
>> | 1-ring | 2-ring |---------------------
>> | | | default | 2-ring
>> -------------+------------+----------+---------------------
>> dlm | tcp | sctp | tcp | sctp
>> -------------+------------+----------+---------------------
>>
>> -------------+----------------------------+----------------------
>> | totem.transport = udpu/udp | totem.transport=knet
>> corosync 3.x |----------------------------+----------------------
>> | 1-ring | 1-link | multi-links
>> -------------+----------------------------+---------+-----------
>> dlm | tcp | tcp | sctp
>> -------------+----------------------------+---------+-----------
>>
>> At last, this patch should be work with updated kernel dlm module.
>
> I am not getting why the network protocol configuration has anything
> to do with the corosync configuration.
> I know that we currently get the address configurations from corosync
> but with this patch we are forced to use SCTP when corosync provides
> more than one "ring" configuration?
Yes. this patch will force dlm to change to SCTP when corosync provides
more than one "ring".
The reason:
(without this patch) When a user sets up multi-links on corosync3
and corosync.conf with an incorrect or missing rrp_mode,
dlm_tcp_listen_validate() will trigger 'dlm_local_count > 1' and report
an error.
Please note, rrp_mode is obsolete; the dlm_daemon will fail to read this
config item in the further. Therefore, the network protocol will
always be TCP.
>
> Even with corosync3 it should be possible to use corosync in SCTP
> (multiple rings) and the kernel dlm using TCP only, would this not be
> possible with dlm_controld then?
Only one case for above case: corosync3 on single-link.
A new patch is needed for dlm to work over TCP when corosync3 in SCTP
(multi-link mode). i.e. dlm_tcp_listen_validate() shouldn't return
-EINVAL when 'dlm_local_count > 1'.
A key point for dlm is that there is no way to get the corosync version.
This patch is compatible with corosync2 env. In corosync2, the user must
correctly config rrp_mode when using 2-ring.
i.e.:
In corosync2, change to 2-ring from 1-ring (whatever multicast mode).
There must include rrp_mode item, if not, error report:
corosync[1284]: [MAIN ] parse error in config: 2 is too many configured interfaces for the rrp_mode setting none.
corosync[1284]: [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 8 at main.c:1415.
Even more, since corosync3 isn't compatible with corosync2,
in my view, latest version of dlm_tools should only focus on corosync3
and drop corosync2 support. If any Linux distribution stay with
corosync2, they should choose an old version of dlm_tools.
- Heming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-24 8:42 [PATCH 0/1] dlm_tools: support corosync3/knet multi-link Heming Zhao
2024-12-24 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] dlm_controld: " Heming Zhao
2025-01-06 18:11 ` Alexander Aring
2025-01-07 4:59 ` Heming Zhao [this message]
2025-01-08 15:54 ` Alexander Aring
2025-01-09 2:26 ` Heming Zhao
2025-01-09 15:34 ` Alexander Aring
2025-01-09 15:38 ` christine caulfield
2025-01-10 14:28 ` Heming Zhao
2025-01-10 14:43 ` christine caulfield
2025-01-13 3:12 ` Heming Zhao
2025-01-17 15:11 ` Alexander Aring
2025-01-17 15:16 ` christine caulfield
2025-02-18 11:46 ` Heming Zhao
2025-02-18 16:35 ` Alexander Aring
2025-02-20 3:56 ` Heming Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efad042e-6035-4045-b4e8-7798055945a1@suse.com \
--to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=ZZhou@suse.com \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=glass.su@suse.com \
--cc=jfriesse@redhat.com \
--cc=nicholas.yang@suse.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox