From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
To: "'Jeff King'" <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "'Junio C Hamano'" <gitster@pobox.com>, <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Linux Kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<git-packagers@googlegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Breakage] Git v2.21.0-rc0 - t5318 (NonStop)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:49:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001101d4bfd6$b9430230$2bc90690$@nexbridge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208165052.GC23461@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On February 8, 2019 11:51, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 06:08:33AM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote:
>
> > t5318 is rather problematic and I have no good way to fix this. There
> > is no /dev/zero on the platform, and the corrupt_graph_and_verify
> > hard-codes if=/dev/zero, which is a linux-specific pseudo device.
> > Please provide a more platform independent way of testing this
> > feature. Pretty much all subtests from 46 onward fail as a result.
>
> We did discuss this at the time of the patch, but it seems we already use
> /dev/zero in a bunch of places:
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqbm57rkg5.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
>
> Were you just skipping the other tests before?
I did not catch the implications of the review at the time - my bad. We were not intentionally skipping the tests. It looks like some are automatically skipped. t4153 automatically skips (missing TTY), and t5562 fails also but for a different reason (hang - we don't have apache2 to serve up http content).
Would you object to something like this:
if [ ! -e /dev/zero ]; then
# use shred or some other mechanism (still trying to figure out a solution)
else
# existing dd
fi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 11:08 [Breakage] Git v2.21.0-rc0 - t5318 (NonStop) Randall S. Becker
2019-02-08 16:50 ` Jeff King
2019-02-08 17:49 ` Randall S. Becker [this message]
2019-02-08 18:03 ` Jeff King
2019-02-08 18:29 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-02-08 19:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-02-08 18:47 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-08 19:15 ` Jeff King
2019-02-08 19:26 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-08 19:31 ` Jeff King
2019-02-08 20:38 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-08 21:00 ` Jeff King
2019-02-08 21:44 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-08 22:07 ` brian m. carlson
2019-02-08 22:12 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-08 22:18 ` brian m. carlson
2019-02-08 22:36 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-08 22:35 ` Jeff King
2019-02-08 22:53 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-09 4:24 ` Jeff King
2019-02-09 8:39 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-02-09 16:55 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-02-09 23:29 ` Jeff King
2019-02-10 9:40 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-02-09 16:53 ` Randall S. Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001101d4bfd6$b9430230$2bc90690$@nexbridge.com' \
--to=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=git-packagers@googlegroups.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).