From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
To: "'Martin Fick'" <mfick@codeaurora.org>,
"'David Turner'" <dturner@twopensource.com>
Cc: "'Git Mailing List'" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Stephen Morton'" <stephen.c.morton@gmail.com>,
"'Duy Nguyen'" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"'Joachim Schmitz'" <jojo@schmitz-digital.de>
Subject: RE: Git Scaling: What factors most affect Git performance for a large repo?
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:27:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00b701d04d43$514ddfb0$f3e99f10$@nexbridge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150220065801.7CDC7140BE4@smtp.codeaurora.org>
-----Original Message-----
On Feb 20, 2015 1:58AM Martin Fick wrote:
>On Feb 19, 2015 5:42 PM, David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > This one is not affected by how deep your repo's history is, or how
> > wide your tree is, so should be quick..
>Good to hear that others are starting to experiment with solutions to this problem! I hope to hear more updates on this.
<snip-snip>
Now that Jojo and I have git 2.3.0 ported to the HP NonStop platform, there are some very large code bases out there that may start being managed using git. These will tend to initially shallow histories (100's not 1000's of commits, and fairly linear) but large source and binaries - I know of a few where just the distributed set of sources are above 1Gb and are unlikely to be managed in multiple repos despite my previous best efforts to change that. Fortunately, It is a relatively simple matter to profile the code on the platform for various operations so data on where to improve may be available - I hope.
With that said, for NonStop file system tends to be heavier weight than on Linux (many more moving parts by virtue of the MPP nature of the OS and hardware). Packing up changes seems pretty good, but any operating involving creating a large number of small files does hurt a bunch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-20 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 6:57 Git Scaling: What factors most affect Git performance for a large repo? Martin Fick
2015-02-20 18:29 ` David Turner
2015-02-20 20:37 ` Martin Fick
2015-02-21 0:41 ` David Turner
2015-02-20 19:27 ` Randall S. Becker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-19 21:26 Stephen Morton
2015-02-19 22:21 ` Stefan Beller
2015-02-19 23:06 ` Stephen Morton
2015-02-19 23:15 ` Stefan Beller
2015-02-19 23:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 0:04 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-20 12:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 12:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 14:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-20 21:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-02 19:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-03-02 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-20 22:02 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2015-02-24 12:44 ` Michael Haggerty
2015-03-02 19:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2015-02-21 3:51 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-19 23:38 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-20 0:42 ` David Turner
2015-02-20 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-23 20:23 ` David Turner
2015-02-21 4:01 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-25 12:02 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-02-20 0:03 ` brian m. carlson
2015-02-20 16:06 ` Stephen Morton
2015-02-20 16:38 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-02-20 17:16 ` brian m. carlson
2015-02-20 22:08 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2015-02-20 22:58 ` brian m. carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00b701d04d43$514ddfb0$f3e99f10$@nexbridge.com' \
--to=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jojo@schmitz-digital.de \
--cc=mfick@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen.c.morton@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).