From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Aaron Gray" Subject: Re: Anyone running GIT on native Windows Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:39:42 +0100 Message-ID: <00c701c790c6$512804d0$0200a8c0@AMD2500> References: <2b6901c78faa$cf9aa7e0$0200a8c0@AMD2500> <7vejlufmhd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <2b7f01c78fb1$be4dc6a0$0200a8c0@AMD2500> <463ECEF4.625F3633@eudaptics.com> <463F14FF.F8DF11EB@eudaptics.com> <002801c790ae$d86a1a90$0200a8c0@AMD2500> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Johannes Sixt" , To: "Johannes Schindelin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 07 18:47:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hl6MX-00068p-DD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 18:47:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965927AbXEGQqq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 12:46:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934430AbXEGQqq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 12:46:46 -0400 Received: from lon1-mail-1.visp.demon.net ([193.195.70.4]:5735 "ehlo lon1-mail-1.visp.demon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934429AbXEGQqp (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 12:46:45 -0400 Received: from mwgray.force9.co.uk (EHLO AMD2500) ([212.159.110.144]) by lon1-mail-1.visp.demon.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id FFT94181 (AUTH angray); Mon, 07 May 2007 17:46:43 +0100 (BST) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, >> An .sh to c converter would be the best solution. I will be looking into >> how hard this would be to do. > > NACK. > > A stupid .sh to c converter will almost certainly result in slow and > hard-to-debug code. I had presumed you do not have to really look at the code if the tanslator is sound. > If you had bothered to check, you'd know that there are ongoing efforts to > do the ports properly. This is good. So the shell code is being migrated to C ? Could you give me a link or refernce please ? Aaron