From: <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
To: <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>, "'Junio C Hamano'" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BUG] git 2.44.0-rc0 t0080.1 Breaks on NonStop x86 and ia64
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:05:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00fa01da5dcd$5b060150$111203f0$@nexbridge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002a01da5c94$a1bc5340$e534f9c0$@nexbridge.com>
On Saturday, February 10, 2024 9:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>On Saturday, February 10, 2024 9:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>><rsbecker@nexbridge.com> writes:
>>
>>> The diff appears to have failed because of an assumption of how paths
>>> are resolved during compilation. The assumption is that files remain
>>> partially qualified, which is not the case in all C compilers. This
>>> is c99. My experience with gcc is that it qualifies names differently
>>> than other compilers.
>>
>>I just found this bit of gem in t/unit-tests/test-lib.c. I guess
>>Visual C
>falls into the
>>same category as yours, while GCC and Clang are from different camps?
>>
>>The easiest way forward may be to build on top of it, perhaps like so,
>>to
>generalize
>>the make_relative() to cover your case, too?
>>
>> t/unit-tests/test-lib.c | 63
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>---
>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git c/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c w/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c index
>>7bf9dfdb95..69dbe1bbc7 100644
>>--- c/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
>>+++ w/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
>>@@ -21,45 +21,78 @@ static struct {
>> .result = RESULT_NONE,
>> };
>>
>>-#ifndef _MSC_VER
>>-#define make_relative(location) location -#else
>>+#include "dir.h"
>> /*
>> * Visual C interpolates the absolute Windows path for `__FILE__`,
>> * but we want to see relative paths, as verified by t0080.
>>+ * There are other compilers that do the same, and are not for
>>+ * Windows.
>> */
>>-#include "dir.h"
>>-
>> static const char *make_relative(const char *location) {
>> static char prefix[] = __FILE__, buf[PATH_MAX], *p;
>> static size_t prefix_len;
>>+ static int need_bs_to_fs = -1;
>>
>>- if (!prefix_len) {
>>+ /* one-time preparation */
>>+ if (need_bs_to_fs < 0) {
>> size_t len = strlen(prefix);
>>- const char *needle = "\\t\\unit-tests\\test-lib.c";
>>+ char needle[] = "t\\unit-tests\\test-lib.c";
>> size_t needle_len = strlen(needle);
>>
>>- if (len < needle_len || strcmp(needle, prefix + len -
>needle_len))
>>+ if (len < needle_len)
>>+ die("unexpected prefix '%s'", prefix);
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * The path could be relative (t/unit-tests/test-lib.c)
>>+ * or full (/home/user/git/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c).
>>+ * Check the slash between "t" and "unit-tests".
>>+ */
>>+ prefix_len = len - needle_len;
>>+ if (prefix[prefix_len + 1] == '/') {
>>+ /* Oh, we're not Windows */
>>+ for (size_t i = 0; i < needle_len; i++)
>>+ if (needle[i] == '\\')
>>+ needle[i] = '/';
>>+ need_bs_to_fs = 0;
>>+ } else {
>>+ need_bs_to_fs = 1;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * prefix_len == 0 if the compiler gives paths relative
>>+ * to the root of the working tree. Otherwise, we want
>>+ * to see that we did find the needle[] at a directory
>>+ * boundary.
>>+ */
>>+ if (fspathcmp(needle, prefix + prefix_len) ||
>>+ (prefix_len &&
>>+ prefix[prefix_len - 1] != '/' &&
>>+ prefix[prefix_len - 1] != '\\'))
>> die("unexpected suffix of '%s'", prefix);
>>
>>- /* let it end in a directory separator */
>>- prefix_len = len - needle_len + 1;
>> }
>>
>>+ /*
>>+ * If our compiler gives relative paths and we do not need
>>+ * to munge directory separator, we can return location as-is.
>>+ */
>>+ if (!prefix_len && !need_bs_to_fs)
>>+ return location;
>>+
>> /* Does it not start with the expected prefix? */
>> if (fspathncmp(location, prefix, prefix_len))
>> return location;
>>
>> strlcpy(buf, lnocation + prefix_len, sizeof(buf));
>> /* convert backslashes to forward slashes */
>>- for (p = buf; *p; p++)
>>- if (*p == '\\')
>>- *p = '/';
>>-
>>+ if (need_bs_to_fs) {
>>+ for (p = buf; *p; p++)
>>+ if (*p == '\\')
>>+ *p = '/';
>>+ }
>> return buf;
>> }
>>-#endif
>>
>> static void msg_with_prefix(const char *prefix, const char *format,
>va_list ap) {
>
>This looks like a good plan.
This might be trivial, but I cannot tell. The #ifndef should be changed as
follows:
diff --git a/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c b/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
index 7bf9dfdb95..2d1f6b7648 100644
--- a/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
+++ b/t/unit-tests/test-lib.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static struct {
.result = RESULT_NONE,
};
-#ifndef _MSC_VER
+#if !defined(_MSC_VER) && !defined(__TANDEM)
#define make_relative(location) location
#else
/*
However, if this goes beyond Windows and NonStop, which I suspect it does,
we could add a separate knob in config.mak.uname to pull this in. However,
this does not correct the problem. actual ends up with only:
ok 1 - passing test
ok 2 - passing test and assertion return 1
which fails the test_cmp at the end of the test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-10 18:14 [BUG] git 2.44.0-rc0 t0080.1 Breaks on NonStop x86 and ia64 rsbecker
2024-02-10 23:22 ` rsbecker
2024-02-11 2:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-11 2:47 ` rsbecker
2024-02-12 16:05 ` rsbecker [this message]
2024-02-12 16:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-12 17:59 ` rsbecker
2024-02-12 19:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-12 19:26 ` rsbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00fa01da5dcd$5b060150$111203f0$@nexbridge.com' \
--to=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).