From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wincent Colaiuta Subject: Re: git annoyances Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:27:18 +0200 Message-ID: <01C218CC-9F7C-47C9-A47B-4127E0886DFC@wincent.com> References: <20080409101428.GA2637@elte.hu> <20080411101516.GA31248@bit.office.eurotux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Luciano Rocha X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 11 12:29:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JkGUS-0003Qm-GS for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:28:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758862AbYDKK1b convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:27:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758814AbYDKK1b (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:27:31 -0400 Received: from wincent1.inetu.net ([209.235.192.161]:59780 "EHLO wincent1.inetu.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758841AbYDKK1b convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:27:31 -0400 Received: from cuzco.lan (9.pool85-53-12.dynamic.orange.es [85.53.12.9]) (authenticated bits=0) by wincent1.inetu.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3BARJfX005004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:27:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080411101516.GA31248@bit.office.eurotux.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: El 11/4/2008, a las 12:15, Luciano Rocha escribi=F3: > > Another inconsistency: > $ git remote prune > usage: git remote > or: git remote add > or: git remote rm > or: git remote show > or: git remote prune > or: git remote update [group] > > show specific options > -n, --dry-run dry run > > It took me a while to parse the "show specific options" properly. > > Wouldn't "specific options for show" be better? Yes, or failing that: "show-specific options:" Without the hyphen "show specific options" reads as "verb adjective =20 noun". Cheers, Wincent