From: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
To: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Cc: derrickstolee@github.com, git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
newren@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [WIP v3 5/7] mv: use flags mode for update_mode
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 15:32:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b39c63-5652-4293-0424-ff99b6f9f7d2@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220619032549.156335-6-shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Shaoxuan Yuan wrote:
> As suggested by Derrick [1],
> move the in-line definition of "enum update_mode" to the top
> of the file and make it use "flags" mode (each state is a different
> bit in the word).
>
This message doesn't quite cover all of what's done in the commit. In
addition to moving the enum definition, you introduce a 'SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR'
flag and change the flag assignments to '|=' (additive) from '=' (single
assignment). If those changes belong in this commit (not a later one), they
should be explained in the message here.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/22aadea2-9330-aa9e-7b6a-834585189144@github.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
> ---
> builtin/mv.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/mv.c b/builtin/mv.c
> index abb90d3266..7ce7992d6c 100644
> --- a/builtin/mv.c
> +++ b/builtin/mv.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ static const char * const builtin_mv_usage[] = {
> NULL
> };
>
> +enum update_mode {
> + BOTH = 0,
I know this comes from the original inline enum, but I don't see 'BOTH' used
anywhere. The name itself is somewhat confusing (I have no idea what "both"
is referring to - possibly "both" 'WORKING_DIRECTORY' and 'INDEX'??), so
would you mind removing it in the next re-roll?
> + WORKING_DIRECTORY = (1 << 1),
> + INDEX = (1 << 2),
> + SPARSE = (1 << 3),
> + SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR = (1 << 4),
You're not introducing any assignment of 'SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR' in this commit
(looks like that's done in the next one, patch [6/7]), so you should
probably 'SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR' and its corresponding usage in that patch
instead of this one.
> +};
When the update modes were mutually-exclusive, it made sense for them to be
represented by an enum. Now that they're flags that can be combined, should
they instead be pre-processor '#define' values (e.g., like the 'RESET_*'
modes in 'reset.h' or 'CE_*' flags in 'cache.h')? I don't actually know what
the standard is, since I also see one or two examples of using enums as
flags (e.g., 'commit_graph_split_flags' in 'commit-graph.h'). Maybe another
contributor could clarify?
> +
> #define DUP_BASENAME 1
> #define KEEP_TRAILING_SLASH 2
>
> @@ -129,7 +137,7 @@ int cmd_mv(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> OPT_END(),
> };
> const char **source, **destination, **dest_path, **submodule_gitfile;
> - enum update_mode { BOTH = 0, WORKING_DIRECTORY, INDEX, SPARSE } *modes;
> + enum update_mode *modes;
> struct stat st;
> struct string_list src_for_dst = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
> struct lock_file lock_file = LOCK_INIT;
> @@ -191,7 +199,7 @@ int cmd_mv(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> pos = cache_name_pos(src, length);
> if (pos < 0) {
> /* only error if existence is expected. */
> - if (modes[i] != SPARSE)
> + if (!(modes[i] & SPARSE))
> bad = _("bad source");
> goto act_on_entry;
> }
> @@ -207,14 +215,14 @@ int cmd_mv(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> }
> /* Check if dst exists in index */
> if (cache_name_pos(dst, strlen(dst)) < 0) {
> - modes[i] = SPARSE;
> + modes[i] |= SPARSE;
> goto act_on_entry;
> }
> if (!force) {
> bad = _("destination exists");
> goto act_on_entry;
> }
> - modes[i] = SPARSE;
> + modes[i] |= SPARSE;
> goto act_on_entry;
> }
> if (!strncmp(src, dst, length) &&
> @@ -242,7 +250,7 @@ int cmd_mv(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> }
>
> /* last - first >= 1 */
> - modes[i] = WORKING_DIRECTORY;
> + modes[i] |= WORKING_DIRECTORY;
> n = argc + last - first;
> REALLOC_ARRAY(source, n);
> REALLOC_ARRAY(destination, n);
> @@ -258,7 +266,8 @@ int cmd_mv(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> source[argc + j] = path;
> destination[argc + j] =
> prefix_path(dst, dst_len, path + length + 1);
> - modes[argc + j] = ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? SPARSE : INDEX;
> + memset(modes + argc + j, 0, sizeof(enum update_mode));
One benefit of using '#define' values would be that 'modes' would just be an
array of unsigned ints, so you could just assign '0' rather than using
memset. In terms of the implementation as-is, though, I think what you have
is correct.
> + modes[argc + j] |= ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? SPARSE : INDEX;
> submodule_gitfile[argc + j] = NULL;
> }
> argc += last - first;
> @@ -355,7 +364,8 @@ int cmd_mv(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> printf(_("Renaming %s to %s\n"), src, dst);
> if (show_only)
> continue;
> - if (mode != INDEX && mode != SPARSE && rename(src, dst) < 0) {
> + if (!(mode & (INDEX | SPARSE | SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR)) &&
> + rename(src, dst) < 0) {
Nit: could you align 'rename' with the line above it (per the highlighted
section in the CodingGuidelines [1])? As far as I can tell, the "align with
tabs and spaces" approach is what's *intended* to be used in 'mv.c'
(although it's admittedly pretty inconsistent).
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/CodingGuidelines#L371-L383
> if (ignore_errors)
> continue;
> die_errno(_("renaming '%s' failed"), src);
> @@ -369,7 +379,7 @@ int cmd_mv(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> 1);
> }
>
> - if (mode == WORKING_DIRECTORY)
> + if (mode & (WORKING_DIRECTORY | SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR))
> continue;
>
> pos = cache_name_pos(src, strlen(src));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-31 9:17 [WIP v1 0/4] mv: fix out-of-cone file/directory move logic Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-03-31 9:17 ` [WIP v1 1/4] mv: check if out-of-cone file exists in index with SKIP_WORKTREE bit Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-03-31 16:39 ` Victoria Dye
2022-04-01 14:30 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-31 9:17 ` [WIP v1 2/4] mv: add check_dir_in_index() and solve general dir check issue Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-03-31 10:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-01 3:51 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-03-31 21:28 ` Victoria Dye
2022-04-01 12:49 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-04-01 14:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-04-04 7:25 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-04-04 7:49 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-04-04 12:43 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-31 9:17 ` [WIP v1 3/4] mv: add advise_to_reapply hint for moving file into cone Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-03-31 10:30 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-01 4:00 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-04-01 8:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-03 2:01 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-03-31 21:56 ` Victoria Dye
2022-04-01 14:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-31 9:17 ` [WIP v1 4/4] t7002: add tests for moving out-of-cone file/directory Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-03-31 10:33 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-31 22:11 ` Victoria Dye
2022-03-31 9:28 ` [WIP v1 0/4] mv: fix out-of-cone file/directory move logic Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-03-31 22:21 ` Victoria Dye
2022-04-01 12:18 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-04-08 12:22 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 10:07 ` [WIP v2 0/5] " Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 10:08 ` [WIP v2 1/5] t7002: add tests for moving out-of-cone file/directory Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 12:07 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-27 14:48 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-27 15:51 ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-27 10:08 ` [WIP v2 2/5] mv: check if out-of-cone file exists in index with SKIP_WORKTREE bit Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 15:13 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-27 22:38 ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-31 8:06 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 10:08 ` [WIP v2 3/5] mv: check if <destination> exists in index to handle overwriting Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 22:04 ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-27 10:08 ` [WIP v2 4/5] mv: add check_dir_in_index() and solve general dir check issue Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 15:27 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-31 9:56 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-31 15:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-27 10:08 ` [WIP v2 5/5] mv: use update_sparsity() after touching sparse contents Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-05-27 12:10 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-27 19:36 ` Victoria Dye
2022-05-27 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-27 21:24 ` Victoria Dye
2022-06-16 13:51 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-16 16:42 ` Victoria Dye
2022-06-17 2:15 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 0/7] mv: fix out-of-cone file/directory move logic Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 1/7] t7002: add tests for moving out-of-cone file/directory Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-21 21:23 ` Victoria Dye
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 2/7] mv: decouple if/else-if checks using goto Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 3/7] mv: check if out-of-cone file exists in index with SKIP_WORKTREE bit Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 4/7] mv: check if <destination> exists in index to handle overwriting Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 5/7] mv: use flags mode for update_mode Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-21 22:32 ` Victoria Dye [this message]
2022-06-22 9:37 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 6/7] mv: add check_dir_in_index() and solve general dir check issue Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-21 22:55 ` Victoria Dye
2022-06-19 3:25 ` [WIP v3 7/7] mv: update sparsity after moving from out-of-cone to in-cone Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-21 23:11 ` Victoria Dye
2022-06-21 23:30 ` [WIP v3 0/7] mv: fix out-of-cone file/directory move logic Victoria Dye
2022-06-23 15:06 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-23 16:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-24 8:26 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 " Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] t7002: add tests for moving out-of-cone file/directory Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] mv: update sparsity after moving from out-of-cone to in-cone Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 15:08 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-24 8:04 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-27 13:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] mv: decouple if/else-if checks using goto Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] mv: check if out-of-cone file exists in index with SKIP_WORKTREE bit Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] mv: check if <destination> exists in index to handle overwriting Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] mv: use flags mode for update_mode Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 15:10 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-23 11:41 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] mv: add check_dir_in_index() and solve general dir check issue Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-23 15:14 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-24 7:57 ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-27 13:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-23 15:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] mv: fix out-of-cone file/directory move logic Derrick Stolee
2022-06-23 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] " Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] t7002: add tests for moving out-of-cone file/directory Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] t1092: mv directory from out-of-cone to in-cone Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] mv: update sparsity after moving " Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] mv: decouple if/else-if checks using goto Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] mv: check if out-of-cone file exists in index with SKIP_WORKTREE bit Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] mv: check if <destination> exists in index to handle overwriting Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] mv: use flags mode for update_mode Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-06-30 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] mv: add check_dir_in_index() and solve general dir check issue Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-07-01 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] mv: fix out-of-cone file/directory move logic Derrick Stolee
2022-07-01 21:50 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01b39c63-5652-4293-0424-ff99b6f9f7d2@github.com \
--to=vdye@github.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).