From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dave Korn" Subject: RE: Switching from CVS to GIT Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:23:11 +0100 Message-ID: <03f401c81010$d8833de0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> References: <47125F74.9050600@op5.se><47126957.1020204@op5.se><20071014221446.GC2776@steel.home> <471448D0.6080200@op5.se> <20071016155608.GA10603@old.davidb.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , "'Andreas Ericsson'" , To: "'David Brown'" , "'Eli Zaretskii'" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 16 18:24:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IhpDD-0007hl-Mg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:24:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764700AbXJPQXQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764307AbXJPQXP (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:15 -0400 Received: from mail.artimi.com ([194.72.81.2]:23345 "EHLO mail.artimi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764312AbXJPQXN (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:13 -0400 Received: from rainbow ([192.168.8.46]) by mail.artimi.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:23:11 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20071016155608.GA10603@old.davidb.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Thread-Index: AcgQD4artLH4j0p9QxueRGyPsfZN1wAAR3SQ X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2007 16:23:11.0795 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8819030:01C81010] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 16 October 2007 16:56, David Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:25:21AM -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> On the other hand, what packages have 100K files? If there's only one >> -- the Linux kernel -- then I think this kind of performance is for >> all practical purposes unimportant on Windows, because while it is >> reasonable to assume that someone would like to use git on Windows, >> assuming that someone will develop the Linux kernel on Windows is -- >> how should I put it -- _really_ far-fetched ;-) > > Oh, I wish others could think this clearly. Quoting a serious line off of > a task list at an unnamed company: > > - Make Linux kernel compile under windows. > > I don't think it will move past just being a wish list item, but there seem > to be people that think it should be done. > > Admittedly, they don't want developers doing it on windows, but want to > integrate kernel building into a windows-heavy build and release process. Do that kind of thing here all the time, hence my previous post. Apart from the netfilter stuff with the filenames-that-match-in-all-but-case, no real problems, took me a couple of hours one afternoon. Cygwin is a good match for linux dev work. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....