git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Cc: christian.couder@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
	shyamthakkar001@gmail.com, kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com,
	gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [GSOC PATCH v3] commit: avoid scanning trailing comments when 'core.commentChar' is "auto"
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 09:23:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <062e7abd-97b1-4806-9753-338906642265@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE7as+abNzqbGSCWsuYe8D_c5dBUuRdDEbHL0pVW5j3kTMER4Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ayush

On 03/07/2025 00:46, Ayush Chandekar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 1:02 AM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
>> index eb60c293ab3..bb75bdc65d3 100644
>> --- a/config.c
>> +++ b/config.c
>> @@ -1537,9 +1537,11 @@ static int git_default_core_config(const char
>> *var, const char *value,
>>                !strcmp(var, "core.commentstring")) {
>>                    if (!value)
>>                            return config_error_nonbool(var);
>> -                else if (!strcasecmp(value, "auto"))
>> +                else if (!strcasecmp(value, "auto")) {
>>                            auto_comment_line_char = 1;
>> -                else if (value[0]) {
>> +                        FREE_AND_NULL(comment_line_str_to_free);
>> +                        comment_line_str = "#";
>> +                } else if (value[0]) {
>>                            if (strchr(value, '\n'))
>>                                    return error(_("%s cannot contain
>> newline"), var);
>>                            comment_line_str = value;
>>
> 
> Thanks, I understood it.
> 
> What if we simply return the function `adjust_comment_line_char()` if
> we get a non-zero value from `ignored_log_message_bytes()`, i.e we
> won't scan the commit message in case conflict message exists, and we
> let the old code exist as it is?
> 
> +       if(ignored_log_message_bytes(sb->buf, sb->len))
> +               return;

So we'd ignore core.commentChar=auto if we detected conflict comments? 
That might be surprising to the user - it would mean that we'd always 
avoid adding the conflict comments to the commit message but we'd lose 
any lines that begin with the comment string. I think I'm leaning 
slightly towards the original solution but it is not clear to me that 
one option is much better that the other.

Thanks

Phillip


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-04  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-26 13:22 [GSOC PATCH] commit: avoid scanning trailing comments when 'core.commentChar' is "auto" Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-26 14:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-26 21:30   ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-26 15:40 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-06-26 21:28   ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-26 22:16 ` [GSOC PATCH v2] " Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-27  8:34   ` Phillip Wood
2025-06-27 14:52     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-28 10:37       ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-28 13:38       ` Phillip Wood
2025-06-28 14:33         ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-30  8:59           ` Phillip Wood
2025-06-30 17:34             ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-28 15:10         ` Phillip Wood
2025-06-30 14:11         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-28 10:18     ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-06-27  9:04   ` Christian Couder
2025-06-30 18:25 ` [GSOC PATCH v3] " Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-01 13:17   ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-01 18:33     ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-01 19:31       ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-02 23:46         ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-04  8:23           ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2025-07-08 15:47             ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-09 14:17               ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-15 18:51 ` [GSOC PATCH 0/2] commit: improve behaviour of core.commentChar=auto for comments in commit messages Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-15 18:51   ` [GSOC PATCH 1/2] commit: avoid scanning trailing comments when 'core.commentChar' is "auto" Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-15 18:57     ` [GSOC PATCH v4 " Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-15 18:51   ` [GSOC PATCH 2/2] config: set comment_line_str to "#" when core.commentChar=auto Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-15 18:57     ` [GSOC PATCH v4 " Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-15 21:23     ` [GSOC PATCH " Junio C Hamano
2025-07-15 22:15       ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-15 23:30         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-16 11:04           ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-16 15:21             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-16 15:24               ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-16 15:29                 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-15 18:56   ` [GSOC PATCH v4 0/2] commit: improve behaviour of core.commentChar=auto for comments in commit messages Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-16 11:43 ` [GSOC PATCH v5 " Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-16 11:43   ` [GSOC PATCH v5 1/2] commit: avoid scanning trailing comments when 'core.commentChar' is "auto" Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-16 11:43   ` [GSOC PATCH v5 2/2] config: set comment_line_str to "#" when core.commentChar=auto Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-16 15:28     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-16 14:28   ` [GSOC PATCH v5 0/2] commit: improve behaviour of core.commentChar=auto for comments in commit messages Phillip Wood
2025-07-16 15:29     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=062e7abd-97b1-4806-9753-338906642265@gmail.com \
    --to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=shyamthakkar001@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).