From: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Cc: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2] submodule: Demonstrate known breakage during recursive merge
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:28:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <074f22629c034dba738b7241c78229db7f9159ec.1314275112.git.brad.king@kitware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <680d2679c3275c01152500760311b5f96a93ea62.1314193375.git.brad.king@kitware.com>
Since commit 68d03e4a (Implement automatic fast-forward merge for
submodules, 2010-07-07) we try to suggest submodule commits that resolve
a conflict. Consider a true recursive merge case
b---bc
/ \ /
o X
\ / \
c---cb
in which the two heads themselves (bc,cb) had resolved a submodule
conflict (i.e. reference different commits than their parents). The
submodule merge search runs during the temporary merge of the two merge
bases (b,c) and prints out a suggestion that is not meaningful to the
user. Then during the main merge the submodule merge search runs again
but dies with the message
fatal: --ancestry-path given but there are no bottom commits
while trying to enumerate candidates. Demonstrate this known breakage
with a new test in t7405-submodule-merge covering the case.
Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
---
This fixes the first version of the patch by using "merge --no-commit"
instead of "merge -n" where the intention is to not commit the merge.
Both instances are followed by a submodule checkout, add, and then a
real commit. Now the history in the test actually looks like what
is in the commit message.
Brad
t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh b/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
index a8fb30b..14da2e3 100755
--- a/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
+++ b/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
@@ -228,4 +228,55 @@ test_expect_success 'merging with a modify/modify conflict between merge bases'
git merge d
'
+# canonical criss-cross history in top and submodule
+test_expect_success 'setup for recursive merge with submodule' '
+ mkdir merge-recursive &&
+ (cd merge-recursive &&
+ git init &&
+ mkdir sub &&
+ (cd sub &&
+ git init &&
+ test_commit a &&
+ git checkout -b sub-b master &&
+ test_commit b &&
+ git checkout -b sub-c master &&
+ test_commit c &&
+ git checkout -b sub-bc sub-b &&
+ git merge sub-c &&
+ git checkout -b sub-cb sub-c &&
+ git merge sub-b &&
+ git checkout master) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m a &&
+ git checkout -b top-b master &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-b) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m b &&
+ git checkout -b top-c master &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-c) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m c &&
+ git checkout -b top-bc top-b &&
+ git merge -s ours --no-commit top-c &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-bc) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m bc &&
+ git checkout -b top-cb top-c &&
+ git merge -s ours --no-commit top-b &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-cb) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m cb)
+'
+
+# merge should leave submodule unmerged in index
+test_expect_failure 'recursive merge with submodule' '
+ (cd merge-recursive &&
+ test_must_fail git merge top-bc &&
+ echo "160000 $(git rev-parse top-cb:sub) 2 sub" > expect2 &&
+ echo "160000 $(git rev-parse top-bc:sub) 3 sub" > expect3 &&
+ git ls-files -u > actual &&
+ grep "$(cat expect2)" actual > /dev/null &&
+ grep "$(cat expect3)" actual > /dev/null)
+'
+
test_done
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-25 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 13:59 [PATCH] submodule: Demonstrate known breakage during recursive merge Brad King
2011-08-24 19:14 ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-24 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-24 19:46 ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-24 20:02 ` Brad King
2011-08-24 20:27 ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-24 20:40 ` Brad King
2011-08-24 21:32 ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-25 16:49 ` [PATCH] rev-list: Demonstrate breakage with --ancestry-path --all Brad King
2011-08-25 23:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 23:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26 1:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] revision: keep track of the end-user input from the command line Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26 1:08 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-08-26 2:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26 1:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] revision: do not include sibling history in --ancestry-path output Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26 12:51 ` Brad King
2011-08-24 22:43 ` [PATCH] submodule: Demonstrate known breakage during recursive merge Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 21:11 ` [PATCH] allow multiple calls to submodule merge search for the same path Heiko Voigt
2011-08-25 23:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 12:28 ` Brad King [this message]
2011-08-26 14:18 ` [PATCH/RFC] submodule: Search for merges only at end of recursive merge Brad King
2011-08-26 19:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26 19:30 ` [PATCH v2/RFC] " Brad King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=074f22629c034dba738b7241c78229db7f9159ec.1314275112.git.brad.king@kitware.com \
--to=brad.king@kitware.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).