git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Cc: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2] submodule: Demonstrate known breakage during recursive merge
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:28:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <074f22629c034dba738b7241c78229db7f9159ec.1314275112.git.brad.king@kitware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <680d2679c3275c01152500760311b5f96a93ea62.1314193375.git.brad.king@kitware.com>

Since commit 68d03e4a (Implement automatic fast-forward merge for
submodules, 2010-07-07) we try to suggest submodule commits that resolve
a conflict.  Consider a true recursive merge case

    b---bc
   / \ /
  o   X
   \ / \
    c---cb

in which the two heads themselves (bc,cb) had resolved a submodule
conflict (i.e. reference different commits than their parents).  The
submodule merge search runs during the temporary merge of the two merge
bases (b,c) and prints out a suggestion that is not meaningful to the
user.  Then during the main merge the submodule merge search runs again
but dies with the message

  fatal: --ancestry-path given but there are no bottom commits

while trying to enumerate candidates.  Demonstrate this known breakage
with a new test in t7405-submodule-merge covering the case.

Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
---

This fixes the first version of the patch by using "merge --no-commit"
instead of "merge -n" where the intention is to not commit the merge.
Both instances are followed by a submodule checkout, add, and then a
real commit.  Now the history in the test actually looks like what
is in the commit message.

Brad

 t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh b/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
index a8fb30b..14da2e3 100755
--- a/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
+++ b/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
@@ -228,4 +228,55 @@ test_expect_success 'merging with a modify/modify conflict between merge bases'
 	git merge d
 '
 
+# canonical criss-cross history in top and submodule
+test_expect_success 'setup for recursive merge with submodule' '
+	mkdir merge-recursive &&
+	(cd merge-recursive &&
+	 git init &&
+	 mkdir sub &&
+	 (cd sub &&
+	  git init &&
+	  test_commit a &&
+	  git checkout -b sub-b master &&
+	  test_commit b &&
+	  git checkout -b sub-c master &&
+	  test_commit c &&
+	  git checkout -b sub-bc sub-b &&
+	  git merge sub-c &&
+	  git checkout -b sub-cb sub-c &&
+	  git merge sub-b &&
+	  git checkout master) &&
+	 git add sub &&
+	 git commit -m a &&
+	 git checkout -b top-b master &&
+	 (cd sub && git checkout sub-b) &&
+	 git add sub &&
+	 git commit -m b &&
+	 git checkout -b top-c master &&
+	 (cd sub && git checkout sub-c) &&
+	 git add sub &&
+	 git commit -m c &&
+	 git checkout -b top-bc top-b &&
+	 git merge -s ours --no-commit top-c &&
+	 (cd sub && git checkout sub-bc) &&
+	 git add sub &&
+	 git commit -m bc &&
+	 git checkout -b top-cb top-c &&
+	 git merge -s ours --no-commit top-b &&
+	 (cd sub && git checkout sub-cb) &&
+	 git add sub &&
+	 git commit -m cb)
+'
+
+# merge should leave submodule unmerged in index
+test_expect_failure 'recursive merge with submodule' '
+	(cd merge-recursive &&
+	 test_must_fail git merge top-bc &&
+	 echo "160000 $(git rev-parse top-cb:sub) 2	sub" > expect2 &&
+	 echo "160000 $(git rev-parse top-bc:sub) 3	sub" > expect3 &&
+	 git ls-files -u > actual &&
+	 grep "$(cat expect2)" actual > /dev/null &&
+	 grep "$(cat expect3)" actual > /dev/null)
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
1.7.4.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-25 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-24 13:59 [PATCH] submodule: Demonstrate known breakage during recursive merge Brad King
2011-08-24 19:14 ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-24 19:24   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-24 19:46     ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-24 20:02       ` Brad King
2011-08-24 20:27         ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-24 20:40           ` Brad King
2011-08-24 21:32             ` Heiko Voigt
2011-08-25 16:49               ` [PATCH] rev-list: Demonstrate breakage with --ancestry-path --all Brad King
2011-08-25 23:08                 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 23:49                   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26  1:00                 ` [PATCH 1/2] revision: keep track of the end-user input from the command line Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26  1:08                   ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-08-26  2:21                     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26  1:00                 ` [PATCH 2/2] revision: do not include sibling history in --ancestry-path output Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26 12:51                   ` Brad King
2011-08-24 22:43       ` [PATCH] submodule: Demonstrate known breakage during recursive merge Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 21:11         ` [PATCH] allow multiple calls to submodule merge search for the same path Heiko Voigt
2011-08-25 23:22           ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 23:28             ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 23:39               ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-25 12:28 ` Brad King [this message]
2011-08-26 14:18   ` [PATCH/RFC] submodule: Search for merges only at end of recursive merge Brad King
2011-08-26 19:04     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-26 19:30       ` [PATCH v2/RFC] " Brad King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=074f22629c034dba738b7241c78229db7f9159ec.1314275112.git.brad.king@kitware.com \
    --to=brad.king@kitware.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).