git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
To: "'Bruce Perry'" <bruce.a.perry@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Bruce Perry via GitGitGadget'" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	<git@vger.kernel.org>, "'Stefan Beller'" <stefanbeller@gmail.com>,
	"'Emily Shaffer'" <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] clone: shallow-submodules should be single-branch by default
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:05:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <082a01dacd52$056ddf70$10499e50$@nexbridge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ_CbHX5nyvMy3ZO+YYCWnPhUmS2QZJjTzsePqXT2TEy-LBQfQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 1:00 AM, Bruce Perry wrote:
>Perhaps I was using imprecise terminology. This change should not impact whether
>submodule clones land in a detached head state, so it should not impact anything
>that assumes submodule clones are detached head.
>
>The change being made is this: "git clone --recurse-submodules --shallow-
>submodules" currently gives you a submodule with a detached head at the desired
>state, but also downloads data for the tips of all branches in the remote being
>cloned (potentially a lot of unneeded data as in my use case). The modification
>means the same command would give you a detached head at the desired state,
>plus the tip of only the default branch in the remote. The modified behavior
>matches the current behavior for a simple "git clone" followed by "git submodule
>update --init --recurse--submodules --depth=1".
>
>Thanks,
>Bruce
>
>(Resent due to a formatting failure)
>
>On Tue, Jul 2, 2024, 1:12 PM <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 3:08 PM, Bruce Perry wrote:
>> >I noticed a couple places where the behavior of recursive clones for
>> >shallow submodules does not match what is implied by the
>> >documentation. Shallow submodules should be, but aren't, single
>> >branch by default. It would also be useful to allow users to override
>> >the shallow specification in gitmodules on the command line for
>> >clones as they can for submodule update. The modification here for the former is
>a bit ugly, but hopefully at least gets the point across to start a discussion.
>> >First time submitting a patch here, hopefully I'm getting the process right.
>> >
>> >Bruce Perry (2):
>> >  clone: shallow-submodules should be single-branch by default
>> >  clone: no-shallow-submodules clone overrides option in gitmodules
>> >
>> > Documentation/git-clone.txt         |  3 ++
>> > Documentation/gitmodules.txt        |  4 +--
>> > builtin/clone.c                     | 10 ++++--
>> > t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh | 52
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> > 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >
>> >base-commit: daed0c68e94967bfbb3f87e15f7c9090dc1aa1e1
>> >Published-As:
>> >https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-
>> >1740%2Fbaperry2%2Fsubmods-clone-bug-v1
>> >Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-
>> >1740/baperry2/submods-clone-bug-v1
>> >Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/1740
>>
>> I am concerned about this one. Many CI systems (including Jenkins GitSCM)
>assume a detached head for submodule clone/checkout. Adding a branch to the mix
>will change the expected semantics. Am I missing something?

Thanks for clearing that up. Fine with me.
Regards
Randall


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-03 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-02 19:07 [PATCH 0/2] clone: shallow-submodules should be single-branch by default Bruce Perry via GitGitGadget
2024-07-02 19:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bruce Perry via GitGitGadget
2024-07-02 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] clone: no-shallow-submodules clone overrides option in gitmodules Bruce Perry via GitGitGadget
2024-07-02 19:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] clone: shallow-submodules should be single-branch by default rsbecker
2024-07-03  5:00   ` Bruce Perry
2024-07-03 14:05     ` rsbecker [this message]
2024-07-25 17:10       ` Bruce Perry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='082a01dacd52$056ddf70$10499e50$@nexbridge.com' \
    --to=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
    --cc=bruce.a.perry@gmail.com \
    --cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanbeller@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).