From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>,
"Thomas Gummerer" <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Cc: "Git Mailing list" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] t/perf/run: Use proper "--get-regexp", not "--get-regex"
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:33:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0AE4648A05C445FBA049864F455B35A7@PhilipOakley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: alpine.LFD.2.21.1806030935010.21364@localhost.localdomain
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
>> > Subject: [PATCH v2] t/perf/run: Use proper "--get-regexp", not
>>
>> micronit: we prefer starting with a lowercase letter after the "area:"
>> prefix in commit messages. Junio can probably fix that while
>> queuing, so no need to resend.
>
> argh, i actually know that, i just screwed up.
>
>> On 06/03, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> >
>> > Even though "--get-regex" appears to work with "git config", the
>> > clear standard is to spell out the action in full.
>>
>> --get-regex works as the parse-option API allows abbreviations of the
>> full option to be specified as long as the abbreviation is
>> unambiguos. I don't know if this is documented anywhere other than
>> 'Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt' though.
it's in `git help cli`:
many commands allow a long option --option to be abbreviated only to their
unique prefix (e.g. if there is no other option whose name begins with opt,
you may be able to spell --opt to invoke the --option flag), but you should
fully spell them out when writing your scripts;
It's a worthwile read, even if the man page isn't flagged up that often.
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
>> >
>> > ---
>>
>> It took me a bit to figure out why there is a v2, and what changed
>> between the versions. This space after the '---' would be a good
>> place to describe that to help reviewers.
>>
>> For others that are curious, it seems like the word "clear" was added
>> in the commit message.
>>
>> The change itself looks good to me.
>
> the actual rationale for v2 was in the subject, i originally put
> just "get-regex" rather then "--get-regex"; i resubmitted for
> consistency.
>
--
Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-03 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-03 10:14 [PATCH v2] t/perf/run: Use proper "--get-regexp", not "--get-regex" Robert P. J. Day
2018-06-03 13:30 ` Thomas Gummerer
2018-06-03 13:36 ` Robert P. J. Day
2018-06-03 15:33 ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2018-06-04 11:03 ` Robert P. J. Day
2018-06-04 13:33 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0AE4648A05C445FBA049864F455B35A7@PhilipOakley \
--to=philipoakley@iee.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=t.gummerer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox