From: "Daniel Höpfl" <daniel@hoepfl.de>
To: <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug] Permissions of temp file created in git's sha1_file.c correct?
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:25:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bd60a95adcc1cda50d6ff0e8d335216@kloeckner.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3vd128uz7.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:47:20 -0800 (PST), Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
wrote:
> That is why there is `core.fileMode` config variable, see git-config(1)
> manpage:
I saw (and liked) that option but I do not want to use the executable bit
on my "FAT-compatible" file system for other things anyways.
> Didin't git detect that it was on such filesystem?
I did not create the repository on the device, it was simply copied onto
the volume.
One `git init` later: Git detects that the filesystem knows about the
executable flag and sets filemode = true. (On a real FAT, it would be set
to false, of course).
> Not true. Whether file can be renamed or deleted is governed by
> permissions in directory that contains given file, not the file itself
> (at least on POSIX). If I understand things correctly, of course.
OK, then that's a reason to fix my implementation. (Done.)
I still think that a file that is to be written to should not be created
without the right to do so.
> Note that git doesn't store full permissions, in particular read/write
> permissions, only executable bit and "is symlink" thing.
Executable is all I need. Since there was only one bit left in the FAT
directory entries, my file system uses this bit to store the executable
flag. Writeable is derived from/mapped to !readonly. That's all I changed,
compared to a normal FAT.
Thanks for the very fast answer,
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 12:15 [Bug] Permissions of temp file created in git's sha1_file.c correct? Daniel Höpfl
2011-02-02 12:47 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-02-02 13:25 ` Daniel Höpfl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bd60a95adcc1cda50d6ff0e8d335216@kloeckner.org \
--to=daniel@hoepfl.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).