From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB49C433FE for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 15:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229783AbiJHP2c (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2022 11:28:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229459AbiJHP2a (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2022 11:28:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194076360 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 08:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 88-110-102-84.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.110.102.84] helo=[192.168.1.57]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1ohBkZ-0004Fc-4O; Sat, 08 Oct 2022 16:28:27 +0100 Message-ID: <0d7707ba-5cfb-35a6-441f-06bf80053a72@iee.email> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 16:28:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] symbolic-ref: teach "--[no-]recurse" option Content-Language: en-GB From: Philip Oakley To: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Eric Sunshine References: <86355292-cb54-32c8-abf5-542fb4cf9ade@iee.email> In-Reply-To: <86355292-cb54-32c8-abf5-542fb4cf9ade@iee.email> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org spelling correction On 08/10/2022 13:28, Philip Oakley wrote: > The existence of the `maint-xx` branches, and where they came from, was > something that eluded me for a long time. > > The descriptions give the impression there is just a single main branch, s/main/`maint`/  > with a singular name, and that was the end of it. It was only much later > when some security patches were pushed down to numerous older `maint-xx` > branches. The use of the singular `maint` is also used in examples a > number of places further cementing the singular maintenance view. > > A few words clarifying the `maint` vs `maint-x.yy` branches could help > users past the confusion.