From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A02522258C for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.202.254.214 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757443115; cv=none; b=ezbfIP5CNvcKL38GqtJDhoysVHAhBIN1D+dQ97jHVtyz5EfVuQUx8o4NqcCHC9T8LuXlcHv28hHmeXQuz0qqRn7G8pXu+7xRz32TO/dGeCvsoq87zPhCcqn83WdBtQ/Em7R389WlG7WnyRB/9jSydPjv1w+K3BgqUNVJC82pm7w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757443115; c=relaxed/simple; bh=twj8olAN+oMmPBHOZUCH4af9aJja+kztVMsUXQV2yH4=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:Mime-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=CmFKV0cMNt+0bDPLUre3SD1vh7jfmKj3OXBRRFmeiw47CYD8fs83me1P1lUK2EmGgCuzj6Wn8Jh5tZTCeiWthczkEQWz0q3wVm3egpf3LmWTSIBoPKZhLT2L1V0nFkj2tgUa0UfBb9GJq8gv9fRMcfFMJoEjxvaRdQnlOG9g+IA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.202.254.214 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uw39f-0006vj-Co for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 20:33:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org From: Jon Forrest Subject: Re: Is Git Add Supposed to Work Like This (git 2.50)? Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 11:33:18 -0700 Message-ID: <109prte$j8b$1@ciao.gmane.io> References: <63045080-74d6-4835-9d9c-4d3558acdbfb@gmail.com> <20250907233456.GA1281511@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: On 9/9/25 9:00 AM, Jon Forrest wrote: > > > If this were a big deal, which it isn't, I'd suggest a command line > flag that says what to do if there's an invalid file specified on > the command line. One setting of the flag would result in the > current behavior and the other setting would result in all the > invalid file(s) being ignored and the valid file(s) being > handled normally. Nevermind. I should have checked the man page. The '--ignore-errors' option already does this. Sorry for the bother. Jon