From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Catching up: git-pasky-0.6.2 broken?
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:19:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1114273192.27940.17.camel@nosferatu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050423152102.D32116@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1288 bytes --]
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 15:21 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:12:39PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:47:58PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > Any ideas what's going on?
> >
> > Could the problem be related to some random garbage left in .git/add-queue
> > and .git/rm-queue?
> >
> > If so, how did these files get generated in the first place, and why
> > weren't they removed when they were finished with?
> >
> > IMHO updating a repository from an external source should _NOT_ be
> > affected by the presence (or absense) of these two files, which
> > contain only _local_ state information.
>
> Ok, don't bother looking into this - I'm now completely git-free here.
> I think I'll prefer to use the old diff and patch method to submit
> stuff to Linus, until git has progressed sufficiently such that it
> doesn't end up wasting hours of my time.
>
> Yes, it's a radical solution, but since I _can't_ get it to work for
> me, it's the only one which will allow me to get any real work done.
>
> (and it all looked soo promising pre-0.6.2)
>
You did try 0.6.3? Think it fixed some annoying bugs. Also pull and
reinstall it to make sure one or two others might be fixed.
--
Martin Schlemmer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-23 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-23 11:47 Catching up: git-pasky-0.6.2 broken? Russell King
2005-04-23 14:12 ` Russell King
2005-04-23 14:21 ` Russell King
2005-04-23 16:19 ` Martin Schlemmer [this message]
2005-04-23 21:25 ` Petr Baudis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1114273192.27940.17.camel@nosferatu.lan \
--to=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox