From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Cogito Tutorial If It Helps Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:51:05 +1000 Message-ID: <1114649466.7183.210.camel@gaston> References: <1114548747.3083.1.camel@kryten> <1114649337.7112.208.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 28 02:47:03 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQxAm-0001Tq-I3 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:46:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262133AbVD1Av5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:51:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262134AbVD1Av5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:51:57 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:57054 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262133AbVD1Avz (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:51:55 -0400 Received: from gaston (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3S0kNgJ024570; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:46:24 -0500 To: James Purser In-Reply-To: <1114649337.7112.208.camel@gaston> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:48 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 06:52 +1000, James Purser wrote: > > I reworked the previous tutorial to take in the changes in the scripts. > > Will make this a series of tutorials to cover all aspects. Any > > suggestions or hints or spelling corrections would be most welcome. > > > > http://ksit.dynalias.com/articles.php?s_id=46&art_id=41 > > Hrm... this tutorial is exactly like cogito's own readme as far as I'm > concerned : it just makes things even more confusing to me. I must be > really stupid, I should stick to hacking the kernel and not try to use > userland tools :) > > Anyway, can you explain what it is all about this branch thing ? > > I don't understand why in hell you would want linux-2.6 to be a branch > of cogito itself ... Forget it, I must be lacking caffeine this morning, you are adding linus git, not linux-2.6 as a branch which makes a lot more sense... sorry for the noise. Ben.